have tried that but no change..... in fact, the only time
attachement gets converted to "winmail.dat" is when they
pull the address from "ACT! Address Book". If they type
the same address (instead of fetching it) then everything
stays fine.
thanks
-SN
They need to check the settings for the individual address and make sure
it's not marked for rich-text only. If the ACT! address book marks all
addresses for RTF, then the advice about switching to plain text format is
the most likely solution.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
have tried that but no change..... in fact, the only time
attachement gets converted to "winmail.dat" is when they
pull the address from "ACT! Address Book". If they type
the same address (instead of fetching it) then everything
stays fine.
thanks
-SN
>-----Original Message-----
>(pardon my jumping in)
>
>Have the senders use Plain Text or HTML instead of Rich
Text format for
>their e-mail message format...does that help?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> rgds
>> -Sarwar
>>> "Sarwar N" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
in message
>>> news:b76001c40ba2$41dbfc40$a601280a@phx.gbl...
>>> Hello World,
>>>
>>> My ACT! user are having problem in sending attachements
>>> with their Outlook emails. This happens only when they
>>> pull an address from ACT! database using ACT! address
book
>>> interface (service) from within Outlook client.
Otherwise
>>> they are fine if they send the same email (with
>>> attachement) from within ACT! email client.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>.
In ACT! email options (Edit ->Preference ->Email options)
we have only Plain Text and HTML options (no RTF)we have
tried both the options but it did not make any difference.
Interesting thing is when we send the same email with same
attachement from within ACT! email client (which infact
uses Outlook 2000 interface)there is no issue. The email
gets to recepient(s) with the actual attachement.
rgds
-Sarwar
>-----Original Message-----
>They need to check the settings for the individual address and make sure
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
>.
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 19 Mar 2004 15:57 GMT
That sounds like an option for message format. I was referring to the
individual address setting. Double-click the underlined address in an
outgoing message.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
> In ACT! email options (Edit ->Preference ->Email options)
> we have only Plain Text and HTML options (no RTF)we have
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> plain text format is
> >the most likely solution.
> >have tried that but no change..... in fact, the only time
> >attachement gets converted to "winmail.dat" is when they
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> >
> >.
tried that..... in E-mail prop windows, the....."Always
send to this receipient in Microsoft Outlook rich-text
format"..... option is unchecked.
rgds
-Sarwar
>-----Original Message-----
>That sounds like an option for message format. I was referring to the
[quoted text clipped - 70 lines]
>
>.
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 22 Mar 2004 21:46 GMT
Well, that's too bad. It means there's no way to set an option to correct
the problem at the recipient level. You may have to create the message in
plain text format to avoid the Winmail.dat attachment.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
> tried that..... in E-mail prop windows, the....."Always
> send to this receipient in Microsoft Outlook rich-text
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> address in an
> >outgoing message.
> >> In ACT! email options (Edit ->Preference ->Email
> options)
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> >> >>>> they are fine if they send the same email (with
> >> >>>> attachement) from within ACT! email client.
If you see my March 17 posting. We have already
tried "Plain Text" format option (in fact that was the
very first thing I suggested to my users) but that did not
help in resolving "winmail.dat" issue.
I have done some more digging within Outlook 2000 client.
When you enable/attach 'ACT! Address Book' service
using "Outlook->Tools->Services->Add", that's when this
service starts. Outlook uses a DLL named "actab32.dll" to
fetch email addresses from ACT! database. It seems there
is some problem in email address translation at Outlook
side where Outlook is not able to understand ACT address
wrappers. Basically, this looks like an issue
with "actab32.dll" that needs to be fixed....... This is
my understanding of this problem. I would be glad to know
if anyone else sees it differently..... btw, I have seen
similar issues with Lotus Notes Mail service under Outlook
which uses "nwnsp32.dll".
-cheers
Sarwar
>-----Original Message-----
>Well, that's too bad. It means there's no way to set an option to correct
[quoted text clipped - 84 lines]
>
>.
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 31 Mar 2004 14:50 GMT
I think you've diagnosed this pretty well. It might be interesting for you
to get the trial version of Office 2003 and see if it handles it better.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
> If you see my March 17 posting. We have already
> tried "Plain Text" format option (in fact that was the
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> create the message in
> >plain text format to avoid the Winmail.dat attachment.
> >> tried that..... in E-mail prop windows, the....."Always
> >> send to this receipient in Microsoft Outlook rich-text
[quoted text clipped - 88 lines]
> >
> >.
Kyanush - 17 Jun 2004 09:47 GMT
Hey,
Do you know what dll MYOB uses ? cause i have everythign set to plain text in outlook but when i send a email via MYOB it sends it in Rich Text!
Thanks
K
> If you see my March 17 posting. We have already
> tried "Plain Text" format option (in fact that was the
[quoted text clipped - 116 lines]
> >
> >.