If you open it in Notepad, you'll see that it refers to registry values related to a particular version of Outlook, some of which are not supported in earlier versions. Older versions will simply ignore any policy settings applied for Outlook 2003. If you support multiple versions, you need to use the .adm template for each version.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
>I have 30 clients on a AD domain, running different versions of Outlook
> (i.e. 2000, 2002, 2003).
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> /NeXTstep
NeXTstep - 31 Oct 2006 14:12 GMT
Sue,
>If you open it in Notepad, you'll see that it refers to registry values
>related to a particular version of Outlook, some of which >are not
>supported in earlier versions. Older versions will simply ignore any policy
>settings applied for Outlook 2003. If you >support multiple versions, you
>need to use the .adm template for each version.
Why should I use a .adm template for each version if the registry values of
the "newer" features are simply ignored by older versions of Outlook?
Couldn´t I just use only a 2003 .adm template, since older Outlooks will be
able to find out by themselves which registry settings to pick up and which
to ignore?
TIA,
/NeXTstep
Norbert Fehlauer [MVP] - 31 Oct 2006 14:23 GMT
Hi,
> Why should I use a .adm template for each version if the registry
> values of the "newer" features are simply ignored by older versions
> of Outlook?
Because you would configure your "old" Outlooks too? If not, then you can
stick with OUTLK11.adm
> CouldnŽt I just use only a 2003 .adm template, since older Outlooks
> will be able to find out by themselves which registry settings to
> pick up and which to ignore?
Older Outlooks will ignore more or less /all/ policies set by the
OUTLK11.adm. Whats the problem with importing several versions of adms?
Bye
Norbert

Signature
Dilbert's words of wisdom #19: Am I getting smart with you? How would
you know?