Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Outlook / New Users / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Outlook 2003 Archive Question... Any Ideas would be appreciated.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kaylix - 30 Jan 2007 18:03 GMT
I am using Outlook 2003 on XP Pro w/all the latest service paks.

When I try to archive manually or automatically to my archive.pst file
(specifying to archive any items over 6 months old) none of the items older
than 6 months are removed from my main .pst file AND the archive.pst file
is contains no archived items other than the folder structure from the
original file.
I have tried various archive points 3 months, 12 months, 2 years but I
don't get any results.
Any ideas out there? Thanks!
Brian Tillman - 30 Jan 2007 19:25 GMT
> I am using Outlook 2003 on XP Pro w/all the latest service paks.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I have tried various archive points 3 months, 12 months, 2 years but I
> don't get any results.

Archiving works based on an item's Modified date, not its Received date.
Use the Field CHooser to add the Modified date you your view and compare the
dates with your archive criteria.
Signature

Brian Tillman

Peter Durkee - 30 Jan 2007 19:44 GMT
>> I am using Outlook 2003 on XP Pro w/all the latest service paks.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Use the Field CHooser to add the Modified date you your view and compare
> the dates with your archive criteria.
Thanks Brian, I don't know if you helped kaylix, but you've cleared up
something that's baffled me for ages!

-Peter
kaylix - 30 Jan 2007 20:27 GMT
>> I am using Outlook 2003 on XP Pro w/all the latest service paks.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> date. Use the Field CHooser to add the Modified date you your view and
> compare the dates with your archive criteria.

OK, thanks. I'll give it a try, but I'm sure something else is going on as
I have items from 2003/2004 that haven't been touched and they still don't
get archived.
What are some of the esoteric options that could be performed on a mail
file that would mark emails as 'modified' and therefore would not archive
as part of an archiving process?
Brian Tillman - 31 Jan 2007 01:24 GMT
> OK, thanks. I'll give it a try, but I'm sure something else is going
> on as I have items from 2003/2004 that haven't been touched and they
> still don't get archived.
> What are some of the esoteric options that could be performed on a
> mail file that would mark emails as 'modified' and therefore would
> not archive as part of an archiving process?

This article contains some info on that:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/295657/en-us
Signature

Brian Tillman

kaylix - 31 Jan 2007 16:19 GMT
"Brian Tillman" <tillman1952@yahoo.com> wrote in news:#rJ0NaNRHHA.2076
@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:

>> OK, thanks. I'll give it a try, but I'm sure something else is going
>> on as I have items from 2003/2004 that haven't been touched and they
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> This article contains some info on that:
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/295657/en-us

Thanks for the info!!! I appreciate your quick help.
kaylix - 31 Jan 2007 16:39 GMT
"Brian Tillman" <tillman1952@yahoo.com> wrote in news:#rJ0NaNRHHA.2076
@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:

>> OK, thanks. I'll give it a try, but I'm sure something else is going
>> on as I have items from 2003/2004 that haven't been touched and they
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> This article contains some info on that:
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/295657/en-us

Hey Brian -

Just a quick FYI, I realize now what is happening. Recently this users mail
file was corrupted because it was in Outlook 2000 format with the 2gb
limit. The process of recovering the file must have set a new modification
date on each item to 1/7/07. Therefore nothing was being archived. It makes
total sense now.

Thanks again for your help!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.