Not that I know of. Have you tried Right clicking the Deleted Items folder
and using the Mark all as Read button? It's fast.

Signature
Regards
Judy Gleeson
MVP Outlook
Trainer and Consultant www.pragmatix.com.au
My suggested settings for Outlook 2003 are FREE on my website.
.
> Not that I know of. Have you tried Right clicking the Deleted Items folder
> and using the Mark all as Read button? It's fast.
Wow! Two solutions for the price of one! I'd never noticed "Mark all
read" in the folders context menu. Not only that, you made me happy to
have plenty of SPAM to use as cannon-fodder in my experiment!
Haven't been this happy in quite a while. Thank you!

Signature
Steve Swift
http://www.swiftys.org.uk/swifty.html
http://www.ringers.org.uk
Judy Gleeson (MVP Outlook) - 19 May 2008 02:06 GMT
You're welcome. I'm glad to have offered the extra information.
At times it's an awkward balance here between answering the exact question
asked and guessing what the poster is actually trying to do.
Regards
Judy Gleeson
MVP Outlook
Trainer and Consultant www.pragmatix.com.au
My suggested settings for Outlook 2003 are FREE on my website.
.
>> Not that I know of. Have you tried Right clicking the Deleted Items
>> folder and using the Mark all as Read button? It's fast.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Haven't been this happy in quite a while. Thank you!
Swifty - 20 May 2008 07:04 GMT
> At times it's an awkward balance here between answering the exact question
> asked and guessing what the poster is actually trying to do.
Which is exactly balanced by the posters dilemma: Do I describe my
problem in minute detail, and risk people falling asleep before getting
to my punchline, or do I abbreviate it and risk ambiguity? :-)

Signature
Steve Swift
http://www.swiftys.org.uk/swifty.html
http://www.ringers.org.uk