
Signature
Did that answer the question / help?
_____________________________
John Wilson
Microsoft Certified Office Specialist
http://www.technologytrish.co.uk/ppttipshome.html
Sorry, John, that's not the problem. I'm already using Freeform (which lets
you scribble when you want to) for my tracer. For small or very general
shapes, it works fine. My current challenge is that I need to capture
details, so I'm working in the center screen of PowerPoint at 200%
enlargement. Since it's a large area, I can only see a small part of the
perimeter of my shape at one time. I can't find a way to make the working
screen move as I'm drawing so that I can complete the object in one pass. So
I trace what I can see, end the Freeform line, move the work area, and trace
some more. I have linked a series of Freeform lines to get a single
perimeter line, but it does not translate to a single AutoShape. When I try
to fill in the shape with color, I get very strange bits and pieces of fill,
some of which are outside the boundaries of my shape (but in a line
connecting extreme points). I need to wind up with a well-behaved AutoShape,
whether it's drawn all at once or assembled from parts.

Signature
Randy Person
> In the draw menu go to autoshapes > lines and choose either the scribble tool
> (if you've a steady hand) or the freeform tool to trace the shapes. If you
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> >
> > Thanks
John Wilson - 29 Sep 2006 16:43 GMT
Sorry that want very clear. I meant initially work at a scale where you can
see everything to get a rough outline and then use edit points to adjust by
adding points / changing point type and dragging points.

Signature
Did that answer the question / help?
_____________________________
John Wilson
Microsoft Certified Office Specialist
http://www.technologytrish.co.uk/ppttipshome.html
> Sorry, John, that's not the problem. I'm already using Freeform (which lets
> you scribble when you want to) for my tracer. For small or very general
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> > >
> > > Thanks
Randy Person - 29 Sep 2006 17:58 GMT
Thanks for the clarification, John. I understand your point now. I'll
experiment with it shortly, and let you know the results.

Signature
Randy Person
> Sorry that want very clear. I meant initially work at a scale where you can
> see everything to get a rough outline and then use edit points to adjust by
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
Randy Person - 29 Sep 2006 23:27 GMT
John, I found that your idea to obtain a coarse shape at first, then refine
it with edit shapes, is a very workable solution. Once I got the basic
outline, I was able to work at full magnification to do a neat job. Once
shrunk back to viewing size, it looks really crisp and accurate. For a look
at what I'm dealing with, find a map of Washington state, USA. Notice in
particluar the Puget Sound region (near Seattle and Tacoma). You have gotten
my project back on track. Thank you.

Signature
Randy Person
> Sorry that want very clear. I meant initially work at a scale where you can
> see everything to get a rough outline and then use edit points to adjust by
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
John Wilson - 30 Sep 2006 12:34 GMT
That's good
Once you get the hang of how different point types work and how to drag them
it's amazing what you can draw. If you can find someone who's draws cartoons
with flash they'll be able to show you some amazing stuff with this in Flash
(where it's much quicker)

Signature
Did that answer the question / help?
_____________________________
John Wilson
Microsoft Certified Office Specialist
http://www.technologytrish.co.uk/ppttipshome.html
> John, I found that your idea to obtain a coarse shape at first, then refine
> it with edit shapes, is a very workable solution. Once I got the basic
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks