You don't "export" to a .pdf file. Export is usually some sort of an attempt
to allow one file to be opened by another program.
If you really want .pdf files, download PrimoPDF. It's a free program and
you can create all the .pdf files you want. Can't edit them but.............
(I'm spoiled, I just got Acrobat Pro v7)

Signature
JoAnn Paules
MVP Microsoft [Publisher]
> Because 3DS Max can export to Maya,
> because Paint Shop Pro can save as a *.PSD,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> PUBLICATIONS have a built in exporter to an industry standard PUBLICATION
> format.
> Because 3DS Max can export to Maya,
> because Paint Shop Pro can save as a *.PSD,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> PUBLICATIONS have a built in exporter to an industry standard PUBLICATION
> format.
Like Quark XPress, which can export directly to PDF.
But Publisher isn't Quark XPress. It's a cheesy home program designed
to print to home inkjet printers. Period.
If you want to export to PDF, you'll have to ante up more than the
couple of bucks that you paid for Publisher.
Mike Koewler - 23 Apr 2005 02:35 GMT
<snip>
> But Publisher isn't Quark XPress. It's a cheesy home program designed
> to print to home inkjet printers. Period.
>
> If you want to export to PDF, you'll have to ante up more than the
> couple of bucks that you paid for Publisher.
No you don't. One can download a free pdf creation program such as
primo.pdf and create a pdf file.
And your first paragraph is just as wrong as your second one, and you
know better. Too many people produce professional output for your post
to be considered as anything more than a bash at Publisher.
Please don't offer wide sweeping statements that are simply wrong. Okay,
go ahead and do it. And lose all credibility.
Mike
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 23 Apr 2005 10:02 GMT
> > If you want to export to PDF, you'll have to ante up more than the
> > couple of bucks that you paid for Publisher.
>
> No you don't. One can download a free pdf creation program such as
> primo.pdf and create a pdf file.
True, but that's not EXPORT from within the program.
Odysseus - 12 May 2005 00:37 GMT
> > > If you want to export to PDF, you'll have to ante up more than the
> > > couple of bucks that you paid for Publisher.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> True, but that's not EXPORT from within the program.
I know of no application, other than InDesign perhaps, whose built-in
PDF export is a reliable choice for pre-press purposes. Writing PS and
Distilling is almost always a better way to go, even if a PDF-exporting
feature is available.

Signature
Odysseus
Brian Kvalheim [MSFT MVP] - 26 Apr 2005 01:10 GMT
|| But Publisher isn't Quark XPress. It's a cheesy home program
|| designed to print to home inkjet printers. Period.
||
|| If you want to export to PDF, you'll have to ante up more than the
|| couple of bucks that you paid for Publisher.
Wow...you come into the MS world of the newsgroups and post ENTIRELY wrong
information. You are wanted back in the usenet world Elmo.
P.S. Publisher + Adobe Acrobat Professional 7 is STILL cheaper than Quark.
However, as Mike metioned, there are indeed free alternatives (as well as
lower priced alternatives).
Don't let the door hit ya in the @ss on the way out.

Signature
Brian Kvalheim
Microsoft Publisher MVP
http://www.publishermvps.com
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no rights.
Odysseus - 12 May 2005 00:33 GMT
> > Because 3DS Max can export to Maya,
> > because Paint Shop Pro can save as a *.PSD,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Like Quark XPress, which can export directly to PDF.
Only because Quark licenses the JAWS engine -- another third-party
product -- to bundle with their program.

Signature
Odysseus