*  I built it in Publisher because I was enticed by the idea I could use the
same material for printed pages.  M$ never said don't do that if you expect your
website to grow to 300 pages.  Nevertheless, I like using Publisher 2000, and in
general am pleased with the job it does.  There is a kind of elegance to David's
multiple file trick, though it gets a bit complicated and certainly is not for
everybody.  Notwithstanding Bill's frequent comments about the utility of older
versions of M$ software, anyone who has been using PCs for twenty years knows
that is a fiction.  Effort invested in mastering old DOS programs can now be
viewed as largely wasted for example.  So the ability to easily move forward
with subsequent releases is a vital and essential feature.  That is the crux of
the problem with being stranded in Publisher 2000, if that makes sense to you.

BTW, the M$ escalation crew got involved when I was pissed off about problems
moving into Publisher 2002, and subsequently into Front Page 2002.  The top dog
also said he was aware of no larger website being done with Publisher.
Ironically, they asked permission to tout logwell.com as an example of what
could be done with Publisher (this was a few years back).  The site ain't
graphically pretty because it is meant to be accessible to primitive browsers in
the third world (a significant number of hits originate in the old Russian
Federation countries and even more remote parts of the world due to the arcane
content).  But it is big, as you noted about that long winded WRFN page.