Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Publisher / Web Design / November 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Jayda

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jayda - 08 Nov 2004 20:54 GMT
I created my website using Pub 2000. When I upload the site,
the pictures aren't as clear when you look at the web version as they are in
my publisher document. Any idea why?

http://www.lloydminsterbandits.com/coachingstaff.html
David Bartosik [MSFT MVP] - 08 Nov 2004 23:08 GMT
see the faq - http://www.publishermvps.com/Default.aspx?tabid=30

David Bartosik - [MSFT MVP]
www.publishermvps.com
www.davidbartosik.com

>I created my website using Pub 2000. When I upload the site,
> the pictures aren't as clear when you look at the web version as they are
> in
> my publisher document. Any idea why?
>
> http://www.lloydminsterbandits.com/coachingstaff.html
Jayda - 09 Nov 2004 20:34 GMT
But it is not making a gif. It is still a jpg. Is it just the version of
Publisher? Will the newer versions work better when it comes to pictures?

> see the faq - http://www.publishermvps.com/Default.aspx?tabid=30
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >
> > http://www.lloydminsterbandits.com/coachingstaff.html
David Bartosik [MSFT MVP] - 09 Nov 2004 22:22 GMT
Your best solution is to not apply any formatting to the image or layer it.
If you leave the image as is on the page it will repro just fine.
Both 2002 and 2003 handle images differently. 2003 actually generates
multiple copies in different formats and resolutions for each image. Both of
these versions also introduce a lot of other changes, and that's usually a
hurdle for the 2000 user.

David Bartosik - [MSFT MVP]
www.publishermvps.com
www.davidbartosik.com

> But it is not making a gif. It is still a jpg. Is it just the version of
> Publisher? Will the newer versions work better when it comes to pictures?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> >
>> > http://www.lloydminsterbandits.com/coachingstaff.html
DavidF - 10 Nov 2004 01:22 GMT
Jayda, To add to what David said, I looked at your site, and the images
looked fine on my computer. Did you look at the site on different computers?

Also, when you inserted the image, did you scale the image down? In other
words, I have found that if I reduce the dimensions of the image, in a image
editing application, to close to the size of the image box I am going to
use, before I insert it, it seems to 'distort' less. I believe that
Publisher effectively resamples your images to the smaller size when you
Save As A Web Page, and does not do as good of job as your image editing
software would....maybe <grin>.

And FWIW, it seems that most people who have switched to Publisher 2002 or
2003 have regretted it....

DavidF

> But it is not making a gif. It is still a jpg. Is it just the version of
> Publisher? Will the newer versions work better when it comes to pictures?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> > >
> > > http://www.lloydminsterbandits.com/coachingstaff.html
DavidF - 10 Nov 2004 01:36 GMT
I meant to say, they have regretted it, IF they were using Publisher for
websites. The new versions offer advantages for print documents.

> Jayda, To add to what David said, I looked at your site, and the images
> looked fine on my computer. Did you look at the site on different computers?
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> > > >
> > > > http://www.lloydminsterbandits.com/coachingstaff.html
Jayda - 10 Nov 2004 20:38 GMT
No, the images are 100% original size. I scale them down in an image editing
application first. I have looked at the pictures on different computers, as
well as different browsers. I know the pictures aren't terrible...but they
are of lesser quality than the original. Maybe I'm just too picky!

I have also tried inserting the images into a MS Word webpage, and when I
upload that the pictures look as good as the original. I'm not sure why Word
works better than Publisher. I really don't want to use Word to create my
website...I much prefer Publisher. If anyone else has any ideas please let me
know!

Thanks for the help everyone.

> I meant to say, they have regretted it, IF they were using Publisher for
> websites. The new versions offer advantages for print documents.
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.lloydminsterbandits.com/coachingstaff.html
David Bartosik [MSFT MVP] - 10 Nov 2004 20:53 GMT
. If anyone else has any ideas please let me
> know!
>
> Thanks for the help everyone.

uhm, I already stated you need to remove the formatting.

it looks to me that you formatted them with a border. remove that. have zero
formatting on the image.

David Bartosik - [MSFT MVP]
www.publishermvps.com
www.davidbartosik.com

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.