I'm still having problems. I uploaded the file to a new "downloads" folder,
but I can't seem to get the syntax correct. The file is at
/httpdocs/downloads/lg.zip. My address is www.eventservices.ca.
Could you please help me get the path correct? Thank you VERY much.
> Thanks.
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>>>
>>> Thank you.
you used httpdocs/downloads/lg.zip literally, that is incorrect for your
account.
your account uses httpdocs as the web root meaning httpdocs/index.htm IS
www.eventservices.ca/index.htm
your hyperlink should be /downloads/lg.zip
David Bartosik - [MSFT MVP]
www.publishermvps.com
www.davidbartosik.com
> I'm still having problems. I uploaded the file to a new "downloads"
> folder, but I can't seem to get the syntax correct. The file is at
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
tech27 - 23 Nov 2004 17:43 GMT
Thanks David, but I'm still not getting it. Would you mind giving me the
exact hyperlink that I should paste? I've tried "/downloads/lg.zip and it
still says document not found.
Thanks
> you used httpdocs/downloads/lg.zip literally, that is incorrect for your
> account.
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
Don Schmidt - 23 Nov 2004 18:12 GMT
Giving your instructions a try I've found I've been using too much address
in my hyperlinks.
I was using (on about 100 links) a file address, i.e.,
http://www.vanusa.org/downloads/OhmsLaw.pdf
when I could have been (should have been) using
/downloads/OhmsLaw.pdf
While both paths work, is there any performance difference between the two
ways of hyperlinking?
Seems the way I was doing it required a re-pathing to my site a second time.
Thanks for the lesson.
Don
Vancouver, USA
> you used httpdocs/downloads/lg.zip literally, that is incorrect for your
> account.
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you.
tech27 - 23 Nov 2004 18:30 GMT
Got it now. Didn't realize that the file name was case sensitive.
Thanks
Don Schmidt - 23 Nov 2004 19:31 GMT
Great! I do like stories with happy endings. This one did some good in two
camps.
(Thanks to David.)
Don
Vancouver, USA
> Got it now. Didn't realize that the file name was case sensitive.
>
> Thanks
David Bartosik [MSFT MVP] - 23 Nov 2004 20:02 GMT
I cover case and naming in this article -
http://www.davidbartosik.com/2004/11/web-site-advice.htm
there are two types of url, relative and absolute, I've covered this topic
in this forum lots of times.
I typically recommend users go with the absolute as it's less likely to get
screwed up.
Relative is generally used to provide for portability of a site. With
relative links you can move the site to any domain and it doesn't break any
links.
As for performance, well maybe, but I highly doubt it's noticeable by any
means. And I only say maybe because of the mere fact that relative is
telling the browser that the file is "local", it's already here, whereas
with absolute the browser is going out and resolving the domain name first
which in turn is translated via nameservers into the server's IP address.
David Bartosik - [MSFT MVP]
www.publishermvps.com
www.davidbartosik.com
> Giving your instructions a try I've found I've been using too much address
> in my hyperlinks.
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thank you.