> I'm using XP and publisher 98. When I view my website, the image quality
> becomes very poor. I have tried keeping my pictures scaled to 100% to see if
> this solves the problem, but it doesn't. Any suggestions?
> see www.cainvets.co.uk
David,
These images are jpegs, but publisher always converts them to gif format
when you click "save as HTML", or you preview your web publication.
Would publisher 2000 or 2003 be better?
Thanks for your comments,
Mark
> Mark,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> > this solves the problem, but it doesn't. Any suggestions?
> > see www.cainvets.co.uk
DavidF - 03 Mar 2006 12:53 GMT
Mark,
If you open Publisher 2002 and go to Help and About, check the version
number to see if it has been upgraded with the most recent service pack, and
at least SP1. Then go to and read at least the last article on this page:
http://msmvps.com/blogs/dbartosik/articles/category/1922.aspx
It is possible that installing the SP will fix the problem with converting
your jpg images to gifs. You might also run the design checker.
As to which version is best, read all the articles on the link above. David
Bartosik does a good job of describing the differences. In my opinion each
version has both strengths and weaknesses, but I strongly prefer Pub 2000
for websites, for lots of reasons. I think Pub 2003 is superior in many ways
for print documents.
DavidF
> David,
> These images are jpegs, but publisher always converts them to gif format
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> > > this solves the problem, but it doesn't. Any suggestions?
> > > see www.cainvets.co.uk