> Using XP Pub 2003.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Just a test sight yet http://johngriff.com/tmp/index.htm
> Wot am I missing?
David,
This is a learning exercise and an effort to make my rather scrappy site
better.
Thank you for your detailed efforts which I will try to respond to.
In more experimentation trying to answer each of your points I have
worked out enough to carry on and do what I want to do. I have answered
point by point below.
IMPORTANT This works all DIFFERENT in Pub 2002. Seems to work like I
expected??
Regards John G
> Hi John G,
>
> I am not sure what you mean by "the hyperlinks do not display on right
> click...", but I think I can help with the navbar.
When editing the file, if you right click on the navbar or the bottom
line, the hyperlink function at the bottom of the drop box is greyed
out, but if you ungroup the bottom line (against the advice of a
message) then you can make changes to it and display its hyperrlink and
the changes are reflected in all the bottom lines..
Only those bottom lines that are ungrouped will generate links back to
the various pages for Firefox, but work OK for IE
As soon as another page is inserted all the bottom lines and infact all
the navbar elements are grouped as they were when the site is new.
> If the navbars are produced by the navbar wizard, then they are tied
> together. Make a change to one, and it is reflected in both. Your
> easiest solution is to replace the wizard built horizontal navbar with
> a textual navbar that you code yourself, and thereby can use what ever
> link words you want. Reference: Code your own textual navigation menu
> in Publisher
As I said before changes made to the navbar are not reflected in the
bottom line, only added pages appear but never change. Once ungrouped
changes made in one part of bottom line appear in all bottom lines.
But still there is no change of text in bottom line when change is made
in navbar.
This is a Pub thing not IE or FF. In fact a Pub 2003 and not Pub 2002.
> http://msmvps.com/blogs/dbartosik/archive/2006/01/16/81255.aspx
>
> The other advantage to this is the hand coded textual navbar will work
> in IE and in FireFox, where usually the horizontal navbar produced by
> the wizard does not.
Could easily hand code something but was trying to use the wizard as a
raw begginer would expect.
Have not tried horizontal navbar at all.
> Though you probably already know this from reading the newsgroup, I
> would also suggest that you go to Tools > Options > Web Tab and
> uncheck "Rely on VML..." and "Allow PNG...". This will give you faster
> loading pages.
Thats the way it is, VML and PNG are OFF
> And while you are there, look under Encoding, and tell me what the
> default is set at?? I have messed with mine so many times that I don't
> remember what the default was, and in some cases, changing this
> encoding can help make Publisher sites more cross browser compatible.
Encoding is set at Western European (Windows).
> One more tip... Right now you are linking to a photo album on another
> site, and that is great. If however, you ever decide to post more
> images on your Publisher site, then you should consider importing
> them, rather than embedding them into the Pub doc. You will get faster
> loading, better quality images...
The real active site http://johngriff.com links to several Albums in
other directories on two sites and works just fine but I think I can
reduce the size of the thumbnails embeded in the publisher file to make
it a bit quicker.
> DavidF
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> Just a test sight yet http://johngriff.com/tmp/index.htm
>> Wot am I missing?
DavidF - 11 Oct 2006 15:05 GMT
Hi John G,
Sorry it took me a while to get back to this.
First of all there were some changes made in the web building component of
Publisher between version 2002 and 2003. I have 97, 2000, 2003 and 2007, but
not 2002, so it is hard for me to comment on 2002. However, David Bartosik
has written a couple good articles about the differences that would be worth
reading: Web Publication Changes Made in Version 2002 of Publisher:
http://msmvps.com/blogs/dbartosik/archive/2006/01/03/81262.aspx
Publisher 2003 - What's new in web design for this version:
http://msmvps.com/blogs/dbartosik/pages/80555.aspx
What you will find in general is that 2003 is better than 2002 in almost
every way for web building, though it is still saddled with quite a few
limitations.
I think that what confused me was our terminology. When you say "bottom
line" for example, I now think you are talking about the horizontal textual
navbar that appears at the bottom of the page. When I suggested using the
hand coded textual navbar that is described in David Bartosik's article, I
was trying to say to use it instead of the "bottom line" navbar produced by
the navbar wizard.
When you say that when you right click either navbars and the hyperlink
option is grayed out, that is by design. If you insert a hyperlink into an
image or within a text box, the right click option to change the hyperlink
is available. However to change any of the properties of the wizard produced
navbars in 2003, you have to do that from within the wizard...you can't do
it manually. You can right click the navbar and get the option of "Wizard
for this object", or you can select the navbar and click on the little wand
that appears below the navbar. Either will open the Web site options to the
left of your page. You will see Change navigation bar...add, remove, and
reorder links... Click that and the Navigation Bar Properties dialog box
appears, and this is where you modify the links.
If you use the option of both the vertical and bottom navbar, then they are
tied together. Make a change in the hyperlink to one, and it is generally
reflected in the other. This is default behavior for wizard produced
navbars. The whole idea of using a wizard is to make a change on one page,
and automagically make the change throughout the document. With this
convenience, comes limitations, and thus your inability to get the
horizontal bottom navbar to be independent of the vertical navbar.
Now for some reason when you use both the vertical and the bottom navbar,
the bottom navbar does not work in FireFox. It appears that it is converted
into an image, which kills the hyperlinks. And given your goal to use
different words on the bottom and the vertical navbars, you can address both
issues with the workaround I suggested. No, you can't do it via the wizard.
You have to remove the bottom wizard built navbar, and insert the hand coded
one as described in David's article, via the insert html code fragment tool.
You can thus change the words to anything you want, and best of all the
inserted navbar will work in Firefox.
One caveat. Unless you specify a file name for your other pages, Pub 2003
will name them arbitrarily, and it is difficult to write absolute links. For
example if you go to your Travel Albums page, this is the link:
http://johngriff.com/index_files/page0001.htm
While you could use this as your absolute link, it is easier to keep
everything straight if you go to that page in your Publisher document, Tools
> Web Page Options and under Publish to the Web, specify a file name. In
your case you might call that page "Talbums" or "Travel_Albums" or
"travelalbums"...or whatever works for you. Then when you do Publish to the
web, Publisher will produce a file called "travelalbums.htm" vs.
"page0001.htm", and the link to that page will be
http://johngriff.com/index_files/travelalbums.htm . And of course it is
under the Web Page Options that you change the Page Title...the words that
show in the navbar.
As to ungrouping and grouping the wizard built navbars in order to make
changes, I haven't really experimented with that. In general though I think
that when you ungroup, you also disconnect the navbar from the wizard, and
in general this won't work. If you find out otherwise, let me know.
I hope this rather lengthy explanation helps.
DavidF
> David,
> This is a learning exercise and an effort to make my rather scrappy site
[quoted text clipped - 89 lines]
>>> Just a test sight yet http://johngriff.com/tmp/index.htm
>>> Wot am I missing?
John G - 12 Oct 2006 12:43 GMT
Thanks David,
File names and most other stuff is not a problem although I am always
learning.
I have got a working site now but Nav Bars creation is not as it seems,
see the bits in appropriate places below.
Please do not waste too much of your time on this as I have done what I
wanted but if you want to go on I am happy to help.
In fact since I wrote much of this msg I have reworked the whole thing
in Pub 2002 and it was much easier and about the same size.
Thanks again.
John G
> Hi John G,
>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> they are tied together. Make a change in the hyperlink to one, and it
> is generally reflected in the other.
No it is not as far as I can see, nothing short of ungrouping the bottom
navbar and changing their names manually ( usually to the sanme as the
main(vertical) bar works.
This Wizard works as advertised in PUB 2002 so I think I am doing the
correct things.
>This is default behavior for wizard produced navbars. The whole idea of
>using a wizard is to make a change on one page, and automagically make
>the change throughout the document. With this convenience, comes
>limitations, and thus your inability to get the horizontal bottom
>navbar to be independent of the vertical navbar.
Yes I agree it is the idea but it does not work.
If you UNgroup the bottom bar and change the text it is properly
repeated to all the other BOTTOM bars but not to the vertical one????
Nor are changes in the vertical bar reflected to the bottom bar
> Now for some reason when you use both the vertical and the bottom
> navbar, the bottom navbar does not work in FireFox. It appears that it
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> navbar, and insert the hand coded one as described in David's article,
> via the insert html code fragment tool.
No I never wanted different words in the bottom I just wanted the
Vertical Bar words properly reflected in the bottom bar.
If you ungroup the bottom bar it is converted properly and works in
Firefox but still is never connected to the top bar which was my
original problem. Does not have this problem in Pub 2002.
> You can thus change the words to anything you want, and best of all
> the inserted navbar will work in Firefox.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> link:
> http://johngriff.com/index_files/page0001.htm
No those links generated by PUB are fine because the referenced pages
are part of the PUB generated site which is only realy an index to
absolute locations that are buried in the Pub pages and all work fine.
> While you could use this as your absolute link, it is easier to keep
> everything straight if you go to that page in your Publisher document,
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> from the wizard, and in general this won't work. If you find out
> otherwise, let me know.
Well as I said above the wizard does not seem to work when the bottom
bar is connected or not.
Regards
JohnG
> I hope this rather lengthy explanation helps.
>
[quoted text clipped - 98 lines]
>>>> Just a test sight yet http://johngriff.com/tmp/index.htm
>>>> Wot am I missing?
DavidF - 12 Oct 2006 13:58 GMT
John G,
Ok...I won't pursue this. Bottom line is that when one uses the wizard to
automagically produce the navbars you get different results with the
different versions. As I don't have Pub 2002, I can't really test out what
you are doing.
Personally, I gave up on the navbar wizard built into Publisher because of
the limitations. In Pub 2000, it would only create 10 pages, as an example.
I actually use simple textual navbars or a javascript navbar that I import
to each page on my site, but that is beyond the scope of this thread, and is
beyond what most people should consider if they are using Publisher to build
their sites.
Nuff said...
DavidF
> Thanks David,
>
[quoted text clipped - 221 lines]
>>>>> Just a test sight yet http://johngriff.com/tmp/index.htm
>>>>> Wot am I missing?