John,
Yes, you can download the html files, and open them with Pub 2002+. And you
can do minor edits on each page, but you are doing that in a Publisher file
on your local hard drive, albeit a temp file. You are creating a Pub file
when you open and convert the .htm files in Publisher. Then you create new
code...new .htm files when you Publish to the web. You aren't editing the
code directly such as you could do if you opened the .htm file in NotePad or
FrontPage or other code editors.
However, unless you rebuild your site in the Pub file, you will never be
able to do major changes to your site, add pages, move pages, or get the
navbar to work correctly as the Pub html coding engine writes relative links
to each page and each graphic. Open just the home page in Publisher and add
a new page, and that page will conflict with the original second page of
your site when you try to create new html. Minor edits by downloading and
opening individual .htm pages, and creating temporary Pub files to do the
edit, and producing new html files...yes. Major edits of your whole site and
navigation system, no. Not without rebuilding your Publisher file as
indicated in David Bartosik's article. The ability to download and open
individual .htm files in Pub 2002+ is a good thing, but it is not
recommended as a standard way of managing and maintaining a Publisher
website. You should do that from a Pub file on your local computer.
I don't know what to say about your experience with the bottom navbar other
than what I have said. I view your main site http://johngriff.com/ with IE
6, FF and Opera and the bottom navbar links are active and working now. Are
you saying that they don't work in IE 7? I would guess that if you choose to
download the html files and "edit" them one page at a time as you propose,
then that is likely to break any wizard built navbar eventually. I don't
know of any other reason why your bottom navbar would not work correctly in
IE 7.
Thanks.
DavidF
> David,
> I only started this because I believed it was possible to get your
[quoted text clipped - 129 lines]
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> one.
John G - 27 Dec 2007 00:09 GMT
David,
Please see some comments in context below.
> John,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> if you opened the .htm file in NotePad or FrontPage or other code
> editors.
I never meant to imply you could edit the HTML code as you can in
Notepad etc, only that you could modify pages as you could originally in
Pub. There doese not appear to be any tmp files on disk at this time and
certainly there is no PUB file left afterwards unless you specificaly
save one.
More below!
> However, unless you rebuild your site in the Pub file, you will never
> be able to do major changes to your site, add pages, move pages, or
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> standard way of managing and maintaining a Publisher website. You
> should do that from a Pub file on your local computer.
Yes the more I experiment with this the more confused I become about
what you get from BIG files or Filtered files. So as this started in an
attempt to get some pages back for the OP I think I will drop it for
now.
More below!
> I don't know what to say about your experience with the bottom navbar
> other than what I have said. I view your main site
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> to break any wizard built navbar eventually. I don't know of any other
> reason why your bottom navbar would not work correctly in IE 7.
The Nav Bar problem seems to be very repeatable.
http://johngriff.com/ was started with PUB2002 and yes the bottom bar
works but I don't think I can do much with it now and don't really want
to change it at the moment.
A page started in PUB 2002 will have both side and Bottom Nav bars work
OK in any? browser.
A page started in PUB 2003 or 2007 only the side Nav Bar works and the
bottom nav bar NEVER works in IE6 or 7 or Firefox or Opera.
These last experiments were done just starting a FRESH new web page,
adding a couple of pages and looking at WEB PREVIEW on 2 computers
where the results were identical.
I have known this for a long time but never botherd persuing it and
could easily drop it now or I am happy to continue the discussion in a
thread started for that purpose.
--
John G.
> Thanks.
>
[quoted text clipped - 138 lines]
>>>>>>>> help on this
>>>>>>>> one.
DavidF - 27 Dec 2007 13:30 GMT
Hi John,
I think we have flogged this horse enough for now. Thanks for your comments
and perspective.
DavidF
> David,
> Please see some comments in context below.
[quoted text clipped - 205 lines]
>>>>>>>>> on this
>>>>>>>>> one.