 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWordDirectoryUser Groups Related Topics Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ... |
MS Office Forum / Publisher / Web Design / January 2008URL question?
I re-did my website from Pub 98 to Pub 03. I noticed that the url is listed as: http://www.nakarminiatures.com/index_files/forsale_boys.htm my old website did not have the "index_files". It was only: http://www.nakarminiatures.com/forsale_boys.html Is this the way Pub 03 displays it or did I save it to the web wrong? I looked at other website urls and they don't have the "index_files" in their urls. Of course, they weren't using Pub 03. When you Publish to the web Pub 2003 will produce an index.htm file (your home page) and an index_files folder which contain all your other pages and supporting graphics. That is why it appears in the path to the other pages. Pub 98 did not use a supporting folder. DavidF >I re-did my website from Pub 98 to Pub 03. > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > I looked at other website urls and they don't have the "index_files" in > their urls. Of course, they weren't using Pub 03. Thanks again, David. Just wanted to make sure it was correct. What would happen if I deleted the extra png, wmv( I have no videos on site) and wmz (not sure what this one is for) files from my website server? It just seems like there are too many "extra" files/images in the index file. > When you Publish to the web Pub 2003 will produce an index.htm file (your > home page) and an index_files folder which contain all your other pages and [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > I looked at other website urls and they don't have the "index_files" in > > their urls. Of course, they weren't using Pub 03. As we have discussed before, leave the "extra" images alone. DavidF > Thanks again, David. Just wanted to make sure it was correct. > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >> > I looked at other website urls and they don't have the "index_files" in >> > their urls. Of course, they weren't using Pub 03. Okay, David. I got it. Leave well enough alone. LOL > As we have discussed before, leave the "extra" images alone. > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > >> > I looked at other website urls and they don't have the "index_files" in > >> > their urls. Of course, they weren't using Pub 03.
|
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.