
Signature
Ed Bennett - MVP Microsoft Publisher
http://ed.mvps.org
>> I'll gladly pay a modest sum to buy your copy of Publisher 2000 !!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> paying her for her copy of 2000 at market prices) than buying the
> non-upgrade version of Publisher 2003/2007.
I can vouch for it.. Pub 97 is a really well engineered and
ergonomic program (having just finished laying out a 430 page 8x10 book
with an average of 1.5 color illustrations per page)
I wonder if Pub 2000, 2002, 2003 or 2007 are any better or do
they slide into bells and whistles adding little or nothing ?
Mary Sauer - 05 Sep 2007 09:33 GMT
Publisher 2003 was a giant leap ahead of Publisher's before it. If nothing else
the program eliminates the bloat so prevalent in earlier versions. The catalog
merge is great.
Publisher 97 had some nifty templates that were left out of all the newer
versions. The Monday calendar option was never included after 1997.

Signature
Mary Sauer MSFT MVP
http://office.microsoft.com/
http://msauer.mvps.org/
news://msnews.microsoft.com
>>> I'll gladly pay a modest sum to buy your copy of Publisher 2000 !!
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> I wonder if Pub 2000, 2002, 2003 or 2007 are any better or do
> they slide into bells and whistles adding little or nothing ?