ChrisB <chis@wanadoo.co.uk> was very recently heard to utter:
> I guess it could be that Publisher just isn't that clever and I will
> simply have to work out where the pages go and print them
> individually on double-sided? Unless the software will work this out
> for you?
File > Page Setup > Booklet (version-dependent) will do this automagically
The templates are under newsletter and catalogue templates, I believe.

Signature
Ed Bennett - MVP Microsoft Publisher
ChrisB - 30 Jul 2005 00:40 GMT
Yes, I looked there thanks Ed - but it doesn't resolve my problem of wanting
an A5 (but A4 folded) booklet. So it would be printed on A4 which will end
up being folded in half to make two A5 pages. I want it to be able to work
out what page ends up where - when I print it. Hope that makes sense!
Many thanks
> ChrisB <chis@wanadoo.co.uk> was very recently heard to utter:
>> I guess it could be that Publisher just isn't that clever and I will
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> File > Page Setup > Booklet (version-dependent) will do this automagically
> The templates are under newsletter and catalogue templates, I believe.
ChrisB - 30 Jul 2005 00:58 GMT
Ed - I have figured it out. The booklet option allows me to do exactly what
I was explaining.
Many thanks
Chris
> Yes, I looked there thanks Ed - but it doesn't resolve my problem of
> wanting an A5 (but A4 folded) booklet. So it would be printed on A4 which
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> automagically
>> The templates are under newsletter and catalogue templates, I believe.
Ed Bennett - 30 Jul 2005 01:15 GMT
ChrisB <chis@wanadoo.co.uk> was very recently heard to utter:
> Ed - I have figured it out. The booklet option allows me to do
> exactly what I was explaining.
Yes, which is why I suggested it :-)
Glad to hear you sorted it out.

Signature
Ed Bennett - MVP Microsoft Publisher
ChrisB - 30 Jul 2005 01:19 GMT
Excellent - thanks again!
> ChrisB <chis@wanadoo.co.uk> was very recently heard to utter:
>> Ed - I have figured it out. The booklet option allows me to do
>> exactly what I was explaining.
>
> Yes, which is why I suggested it :-)
> Glad to hear you sorted it out.