We have some older Publisher files that we were able to print before we went
to Office 2000. The file format is .php. We cannot figure out how we can open
these files. We just suddenly, in one of Microsoft's upgrades, lost the
ability to use these files. Does anyone know how to get these files open in
order to save them as .pub files?
Ed Bennett - 21 Oct 2005 10:31 GMT
> We have some older Publisher files that we were able to print before
> we went to Office 2000. The file format is .php. We cannot figure out
> how we can open these files. We just suddenly, in one of Microsoft's
> upgrades, lost the ability to use these files. Does anyone know how
> to get these files open in order to save them as .pub files?
.php files were never created by Microsoft Publisher.
They were probably created by PictureIt Publishing or Home Publishing.
Neither of these is the same as Microsoft Publisher, and neither is
compatible with Microsoft Publisher.

Signature
Ed Bennett - MVP Microsoft Publisher
John Inzer - 21 Oct 2005 14:17 GMT
> We have some older Publisher files that we were able to
> print before we went to Office 2000. The file format is
> .php. We cannot figure out how we can open these files.
> We just suddenly, in one of Microsoft's upgrades, lost
> the ability to use these files. Does anyone know how to
> get these files open in order to save them as .pub files?
=================================
You should be able to open / edit your .php files
with Microsoft Home Publishing or any version
of MS Picture It! / MS Digital Image.
The .php files cannot be converted to Publisher
(.pub) files with the exception of a simple copy/
paste which will only create an image of the
file...not an editable layered project.

Signature
John Inzer
magrat_garlick@hotmail.com - 21 Oct 2005 14:39 GMT
> We have some older Publisher files
Er, no, you don't.
that we were able to print before we went to Office 2000.
And if you still had the correct application installed you'd still be able to
print them.
The file format is .php. We cannot figure out how we can open
> these files. We just suddenly, in one of Microsoft's upgrades, lost the
> ability to use these files.
Another idiot blaming MS for their own stupidity. Nothing whatsoever to do
with "MS's upgrades" and everything to do with you uninstalling the
application. How is that Microsoft's fault?
Does anyone know how to get these files open in
> order to save them as .pub files?
You cannot save them as .pub files as they did not, do not and will never
have anything to do with MS Publisher. You reinstall the application *you*
used to create them.
Ed Bennett - 21 Oct 2005 16:02 GMT
> Another idiot blaming MS for their own stupidity.
...
> How is that Microsoft's fault?
Microsoft must share at least part of the blame, for the sheer stupidity of
naming so many products with similar names.

Signature
Ed Bennett - MVP Microsoft Publisher
magrat_garlick@hotmail.com - 21 Oct 2005 16:43 GMT
>> Another idiot blaming MS for their own stupidity.
> ...
>> How is that Microsoft's fault?
>
> Microsoft must share at least part of the blame, for the sheer stupidity of
> naming so many products with similar names.
I disagree. Anyone with half a brain can tell the difference. Trouble is most
we get in here aren't far enough up the evolutionary tree to have developed
the necessary faculties.
JoAnn Paules [MSFT MVP] - 22 Oct 2005 01:34 GMT
I've made the same comment MANY times.

Signature
JoAnn Paules
MVP Microsoft [Publisher]
>> Another idiot blaming MS for their own stupidity.
> ...
>> How is that Microsoft's fault?
>
> Microsoft must share at least part of the blame, for the sheer stupidity
> of naming so many products with similar names.
drc023 - 22 Oct 2005 05:11 GMT
I totally agree with Ed. To be fair Microsoft isn't the only major supplier
to have confusing naming conventions and/or vague instructions. Back in the
good old days when I was in mainframe software support for IBM one of my
biggest complaints was with manuals which had confusing or difficult to find
information. I always considered it a product defect when the resolution to
a problem was in the documentation, but because the manual was so difficult
to decipher multiple customers were encountering the same problems.

Signature
Ron
>> Another idiot blaming MS for their own stupidity.
> ...
>> How is that Microsoft's fault?
>
> Microsoft must share at least part of the blame, for the sheer stupidity
> of naming so many products with similar names.