Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Conversions / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Russian words don't convert

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
julie - 25 May 2006 21:36 GMT
greetings!

I have a word document that was originally created using Word 97.   It
contained English words, along with a few Russian words.  When I now open it
up in Office 2003, in the place where the Russian words were  are various
numbers:  184?42#.

I have tried  converting the file (now in Office 2003) back into Word 97
using the Conversion Wizard-to see if the Russian words reappear--Nope!!

Any ideas of what the problem is?  Or where I can go look for help?

thanks,
julie
Peter Jamieson - 26 May 2006 10:54 GMT
Do you have the same fonts on the system as you used for the Russian text in
the original Word 97 document?

If not, I would try to get and re-install the fonts you used.

However, if the amount of Russian text is small enough, it may be easier to
retype it than to try to solve the conversion problem.

Peter Jamieson

> greetings!
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> thanks,
> julie
julie - 30 May 2006 17:30 GMT
peter:
 thank you for your helpful suggestions--I am trying them out.

 It turns out that on some of the documents, the Russian appears, but on
others, it doesn't.  Any ideas why?  

I really like your idea of just retyping in the Russian words--but in order
to do that, I would have to re-open the document in Word 97, then look at the
Russian word, correct?
thanks,
julie s.

> greetings!
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> thanks,
> julie
Peter Jamieson - 30 May 2006 18:23 GMT
>  It turns out that on some of the documents, the Russian appears, but on
> others, it doesn't.  Any ideas why?

Not really - these character encoding issues usually baffle me too.

> I really like your idea of just retyping in the Russian words--but in
> order
> to do that, I would have to re-open the document in Word 97, then look at
> the
> Russian word, correct?

Yes - if you can't go back to Word 97, that would certainly be a problem.

How much material do you have, and is it confidential or anything? For a
small amount of material I can have a go at converting here if you like.

Peter Jamieson

> peter:
>  thank you for your helpful suggestions--I am trying them out.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>> thanks,
>> julie
Peter Jamieson - 30 May 2006 18:26 GMT
Oh yes, the one thing that may be worth checking for each document is
Tools|Options|Compatibility|Font Substitution. If something is listed in
there it suggests that Word does not have the font you originally used.
However, if you never see anything other than "No font substitution is
necessary..." then this is probably just a red herring.

Peter Jamieson

> peter:
>  thank you for your helpful suggestions--I am trying them out.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>> thanks,
>> julie
julie - 30 May 2006 19:05 GMT
Peter:
 Bingo!!  In the font substitution dialog box, I get 2 entries:

 Missing document font:                         Substitued font:
WP CyrillicA                                            Symbol
WP MathA                                              Symbol

I have checked "Fonts" in control panel, and sure enough, neither WP.. font
is listed.

I have also checked on my "Fonts that are installed with Office "
list--(that lists all fonts for Office 2003, Office 2k, Office XP and Office
97), and these 2 WP... fonts are not listed.

So should I:
 1) Hit the "convert permanently" button
 or
 2) look on Microsoft's web site or the web for these specific fonts?
or 3) something else?

thanks,
julie s.

> Oh yes, the one thing that may be worth checking for each document is
> Tools|Options|Compatibility|Font Substitution. If something is listed in
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> >> thanks,
> >> julie
julie - 30 May 2006 22:19 GMT
Peter:
After finding the 2 fonts, and putting them into c:\windows\fonts,
the Russian appears!!  Yeah!

thank you for your help!
julie

> Peter:
>   Bingo!!  In the font substitution dialog box, I get 2 entries:
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
> > >> thanks,
> > >> julie
Peter Jamieson - 30 May 2006 22:37 GMT
Glad to hear it,

Peter Jamieson
> Peter:
> After finding the 2 fonts, and putting them into c:\windows\fonts,
[quoted text clipped - 73 lines]
>> > >> thanks,
>> > >> julie
julie - 01 Jun 2006 17:14 GMT
Peter:
 well, the plot thickens!
 when I opened up another word document (from the same source), the Russian
doesn't get converted.

 For clarification: Doc1--does work  Doc2--does not

 I have checked on both documents (the 1 that works, the 1 that doesn't)  
1)the fonts--they are installed, as they should be .
2)the rights that I have to both documents--read,write,modify, etc--are both
the same
The only difference that I notice is--when I do Tools, Option,
Compatibility--on Doc1 under "Recommended options for:  I see -->Microsoft
Word 97
But when I do Tools, Option, Compatibility for Doc2 under "Recommended
Options for", I see--> WordPerfect 5.x

I am assuming that Doc1 was converted over from Word 97 and that Doc2 was
converted from WordPerfect 5.x--is that correct?

Also, why does the Russian get converted in Doc1, but not in Doc2?  Any
ideas?  Any ideas where I can go and look?
thank you,
julie s.

> Glad to hear it,
>
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
> >> > >> thanks,
> >> > >> julie
Peter Jamieson - 01 Jun 2006 18:58 GMT
> I am assuming that Doc1 was converted over from Word 97 and that Doc2 was
> converted from WordPerfect 5.x--is that correct?

I don't know either, but it certainly sounds likely.

Most of these compatibility options are only really relevant if you really
need to keep the layout as close as possible to the way it was done in the
original Word processor. In particular, WP uses a different spacing
algorithm from Word (some say it is better). If you don't need that, it's
probably best to start with a clean slate and change the options to the
recommended ones for Word 2003. However, whether that will have any impact
whatever on the fonts issue, I rather doubt. WP used to have its own special
fonts for intenrational character handling and that may have a bearing on
this issue.

Peter Jamieson
> Peter:
>  well, the plot thickens!
[quoted text clipped - 111 lines]
>> >> > >> thanks,
>> >> > >> julie
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.