Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Conversions / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Publishing Word Documents

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John Lane - 24 Apr 2007 15:14 GMT
I have written a few magazine articles, and have found that weird things
happen to perfectly well constructed doc files after they were published. For
instance, contractions or possessives ('s) are turned into "is". or the word
Bolo is turned into "Bob". Is this a common problem with pusblishing software
- like maybe the converstion from the doc file to whatever it uses
(hypertext? xml?) mangles certains text strings? Thanks.
Peter Jamieson - 01 May 2007 21:08 GMT
The chances are that the magazine or magazines uses/use layout software that
may not have good converters for whatever version of the .doc format you are
producing. If so, the question that faces the magazine editor is how to get
the text from Word format into the format they need.

It sounds to me more like someone has transcribed them manually, or even
printed them then used OCR to convert them into the format they want to use.
Another possibility in the case of "Bolo" -> "Bob" is that the text has been
badly "kerned" so that the "l" and the "o" were almost superimposed (you
might be able to tell by looking closely at the text).

A little far-fetched, perhaps, but I don't think Word is the origin of the
problem. It may be worth your while checking to see what format each
magazine prefers and trying to save in that format. For example, the
magazines may be able to cope much better with the more open .rtf format
than the very proprietary .doc format.

Peter Jamieson

>I have written a few magazine articles, and have found that weird things
> happen to perfectly well constructed doc files after they were published.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> - like maybe the converstion from the doc file to whatever it uses
> (hypertext? xml?) mangles certains text strings? Thanks.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.