> and there are no fonts that will have everything in Unicode anyway.
"Klaus Linke" <info@fotosatz-kaufmann.de.no.junk> wrote...
> "Michael (michka) Kaplan [MS]" <michkap@online.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > Of course, this will produce many non-characters,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> areas, such as formatting characters in Word with codes U+FDD0 and
> following.
Very few of which will be usefully displayed to be able to be understood,
right? Also, most of the PUA is on its way out of the core fonts, so its not
too exciting...
> > and there are no fonts that will have everything in Unicode anyway.
>
> "Arial Unicode MS" has all characters in Unicode version 2, according to MS.
And a ton of characters have been added between then and now -- and control
characters and many other items that would come from Alt codes will also not
display usefully, either (even with a megafont).

Signature
MichKa [MS]
NLS Collation/Locale/Keyboard Development
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
This posting is provided "AS IS" with
no warranties, and confers no rights.
Klaus Linke - 08 Apr 2004 23:01 GMT
Hi Mich,
> > Agreed: only 50377/65536 or 77% are "real" characters in Unicode v.2.
> > But it's also interesting to see what has been hidden in the "private use"
> > areas, such as formatting characters in Word with codes U+FDD0 and
> > following.
> Very few of which will be usefully displayed to be able to be understood,
> right?
The formatting characters I mentioned seem to be rendered by Word
independently of the font used, so "no" in this case.
Though I admit that I really don't see much use for them.
> Also, most of the PUA is on its way out of the core fonts, so its not
> too exciting...
Also agreed. Sometimes there are some ligatures or combining diacritics
above U+F000 that come in handy, but I avoid using them.
> > "Arial Unicode MS" has all characters in Unicode version 2, according
> > to MS.
> And a ton of characters have been added between then and now
... which would reduce the number of non-characters you complaied about ;-)
> -- and control characters and many other items that would come from Alt
> codes will also not display usefully, either (even with a megafont).
Not sure what the "many other items" are. Control characers were missing in
Doug's list, too, and it even contained a few "non-characters" (Alt+0129,
Alt+0141, Alt+0143, Alt+0144, Alt+0157).
MS is playing some games in WinXP: Alt+1 will give you a :-) smiley, and
so on
for most of the other "control characters". The produced symbols look like
what DOS displayed for the corresponding control characters.
Since DOS is dead, the introduction of such a gimmick *now* seems a bit
outdated.
Greetings,
Klaus
(sorry for the PM -- I hit the wrong button)