Thanks for the followup. Like you, I do keep this turned on to let me know
where I've used direct formatting.

Signature
Charles Kenyon
Word New User FAQ & Web Directory: http://addbalance.com/word
Intermediate User's Guide to Microsoft Word (supplemented version of
Microsoft's Legal Users' Guide) http://addbalance.com/usersguide
See also the MVP FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/word which is awesome!
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
This message is posted to a newsgroup. Please post replies
and questions to the newsgroup so that others can learn
from my ignorance and your wisdom.
Hi Charles,
Remember a few years back when we discussed macros/tools to clean up manual
formatting in Woody's Lounge?
IMO the "Styles and formatting pane" might be our dreams come true... if it
would work as advertised.
One goal we wanted to achieve is to see which manual formatting has been
applied.
The list in the "styles and formatting" pane isn't always up to date: It
often shows some formatting that allegedly is used X times, but really
isn't used in the document any more.
The other goal was a quick method to get rid of manual formatting
selectively.
The pane has falls short of achieving this, too:
For one, if you try to "select all X instances" of some style or formatting
(to then apply a style or remove the manual formatting), the computer often
shows the egg timer for several minutes.
Find/replace for the exact same formatting in the same doc takes a few
seconds at most.
Even worse, "select all X instances" sometimes does *not* select all X
instances.
Instead, it can completely botch up and select a weird assortment of
ranges.
If you don't notice this quickly, the buggy behaviour can cost you hours of
work.
"Find/replace" is always reliable.
The idea and the interface are great, but the implementation stinks :-(
In practice, I still mostly use "Find/replace".
Regards,
Klaus
Charles Kenyon - 27 May 2004 17:17 GMT
You are way ahead of me here. I generally keep the styles and formatting
pane (and other pains) turned off. I go directly to the styles dialog (the
old one) which has improved. The only time I see the direct formatting notes
is under the drop down. Given your remarks, I may start using the styles and
formatting pane more.

Signature
Charles Kenyon
Word New User FAQ & Web Directory: http://addbalance.com/word
Intermediate User's Guide to Microsoft Word (supplemented version of
Microsoft's Legal Users' Guide) http://addbalance.com/usersguide
See also the MVP FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/word which is awesome!
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
This message is posted to a newsgroup. Please post replies
and questions to the newsgroup so that others can learn
from my ignorance and your wisdom.
> Hi Charles,
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> Regards,
> Klaus
Klaus Linke - 28 May 2004 00:25 GMT
> You are way ahead of me here. [...]
Not much: I only switched to Word2002/2003 a couple of months ago.
BTW, for the curious, some of the threads I was thinking of:
http://www.wopr.com/cgi-bin/w3t/showthreaded.pl?Cat=&Board=wrd&Number=124148
http://www.wopr.com/cgi-bin/w3t/showthreaded.pl?Cat=&Board=wrd&Number=39753
http://www.wopr.com/cgi-bin/w3t/showthreaded.pl?Cat=&Board=wrd&Number=97210
http://www.wopr.com/cgi-bin/w3t/showthreaded.pl?Cat=&Board=wrd&Number=96517
Many of the macros from those threads (aimed at detecting manual
formatting, and cleaning it up) will run into problems with Word2002/2003,
though, because of the new table and list styles.
Regards,
Klaus