Office/Word 2000 ---
I have been helping a friend as she is writing a small book. Twenty
chapters and 144 pages. We have been using the Master Document method
to organize things.
This person is not a power user and keep it simple is always the watch
word here. She has struggled with the outline features and editing and
formatting of the document. She hasn't been savy about using styles
consistently, and things I would do to facilitate formatting.
That said, over the last 6 mos. we have had this master document lock up
on us and crash a number of times. I can't remember how many times I
have had to fix it for her! Initially I thought it was because her lap
top computer was somewhat dated and lacked enough RAM, but we just
migrated everything to a new HP Pavillion Desktop with plenty of power.
Well it just crashed again. So I decided to do some searching on Master
Documents to see what is wrong. I uncovered a number of sources saying
MDs are bad, inherintly buggy, don't use them under any circumstances.
One of these articles suggests using the INCLUDETEXT or RD Field instead.
Can any of you offer advice on these options. It sounds like the RD
Field would be a pain because we want to do a TOC and Index.
If you use INCLUDETEXT fields is it best to link to file or just
include? Have people run into problems with the links breaking?
Formatting screwing up, etc?
Thanks in advance for any sage advice, I can't tell you how stressful
this has become, we have actually considered going out and buying a
different program like Adobe pagemaker or something. There has got to
be an easier way to do this in Word.
RL
&:-jesse\) - 02 Oct 2003 18:14 GMT
Robert,
you would be better off making your master and
subdocuments into a single document. Word is quite capable
of handling that. Be very careful using the master and
subdocument function. It's known to be buggy....
see...
http://www.mvps.org/word/FAQs/General/RecoverMasterDocs.htm
jesse
>-----Original Message-----
>Office/Word 2000 ---
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
>.
Robert Lane - 02 Oct 2003 18:33 GMT
&:-jesse) wrote:
> Robert,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> jesse
What about using the INCLUDETEXT field? Is that a buggy approach as well?
If we do combine it all as one big document is there some way to create
some way to find various sections...it would be the pits if you always
had to page down to find your chapter 15. I would brobably use a find
search -- but this user is at a pretty basic level and searches may be a
stretch for her.