Not that I am aware of. Are you sure your labels are not pre-defined. Most
are already covered.

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Actually, it is possible that they are. Too bad one can not edit those
definitions, or at least add to them in a structured manner.
Thank you very much for your help.

Signature
Alexey
> Not that I am aware of. Are you sure your labels are not pre-defined. Most
> are already covered.
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> >>>> --
> >>>> Alexey
Graham Mayor - 29 Jun 2006 06:27 GMT
Of course you can edit them? Click 'details' and make the changes. Your
personal label definitions are stored under Other/Custom - How many
different label formats are you likely to use for this to be a problem?
Furthermore if the labels are not printing correctly, chances are that it is
not the label layout that its wrong but some other setting (usually a
mismatch between paper (printer) and page size (document) and a scale option
set in the print dialog.

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
> Actually, it is possible that they are. Too bad one can not edit
> those definitions, or at least add to them in a structured manner.
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alexey
Peter Jamieson - 29 Jun 2006 09:24 GMT
If you want to have your own brand listed, I suggest you contact Microsoft
directly (we are just volunteers), provide them with a list and ask them to
include it the next time they update that part of Word. You never know...
If you do that, you could also suggest that a simple extension to the way
the "Custom labels" key in the registry is used would support your
requirement - e.g., if only you could add a subkey called "AksyonenkoLabels"
(or whatever) and add your label definitions under that. (I tried it, just
in case Microsoft had implemented something like that, but it doesn't work).
Peter Jamieson
> Actually, it is possible that they are. Too bad one can not edit those
> definitions, or at least add to them in a structured manner.
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Alexey