Thanks for that I will try it on her pc when I am there next week. I did
check the printer settinggs but not the paper resizing option.
Do you also have any ideas as to why when I tried merging only records 1 to
5 that this actually merged records 1 to 14 records instead of the first 5?
Many thanks
Juliet
> Do you also have any ideas as to why when I tried merging only records 1
> to
> 5 that this actually merged records 1 to 14 records instead of the first
> 5?
I am only checking with Word 2003 right now, but the same principle probably
applies in Word 97.
This partly depends on how you are restricting the records to the first 5.
If you are doing it in the small dialog box that appears "Merge to Printer"
or "Merge to New Document", by specifying that you want to merge records 1
to 5, then Word does that, but still tries to honour any <<Next record>>
fields and fill in the data. because the data source actually contains more
records, Word gets them and outputs them. (I can just about see a rationale
for this if you were doing a slightly complex "Letters" or "Catalog" type of
merge -
with Labels it makes less sense but that's just the way it is).
So to restrict the numbers you will need to use the Query Options button in
the mail merge helper to apply a filter. However, there's no way to specify
"records 1 to 5" in there: you have to specify a comparison with a field in
the data source. So it is helpful if your data source has a field that
contains a record number: then you can do "record number" Less than or equal
to 5.
If you are already using Query Options, then the problem is likely to be
with the SQL that Word generates from your filter options. But let's not try
to cross that bridge before we get to it...
Peter Jamieson
> Thanks for that I will try it on her pc when I am there next week. I did
> check the printer settinggs but not the paper resizing option.
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>> > all
>> > her labels by hand.