Thank you. The .csv part worked - on MS Office Teacher-Student edition,
which both the excel & Word documents were created in. It did not work on my
2000 office.
NOW I am making a directory & it wants to put each person's data on one page
each. (I found several references to working with labels, but they did not
work.) I finally found the fields to insert, so inserted Next Record, but
that didn't work. Do I need to add the fields again?
Thanks so much!!!
ds
> It did not work on my
> 2000 office.
Are you stil ltrying to solve this problem? Is your Teach-Student edition
Office XP (2002) or 2003? Using an Excel XP/2003 data source with Word 2000
may well cause problems.
> NOW I am making a directory & it wants to put each person's data on one
> page
> each. (I found several references to working with labels, but they did
> not
> work.) I finally found the fields to insert, so inserted Next Record, but
> that didn't work. Do I need to add the fields again?
Typically, for a directory, you need to specify that the merge type is
Catalog (Word 2000) or Directory (Word XP/2003). In Word 2000 you can do
that in the first step in the Mail merge helper. In Word XP/2003 it is
usually easiest to enable the Mail merge toolbar (Word Tools|Customize) then
select the merge type using the first button in the toolbar.
When you create a catalog (or directory) type merge, you should lay out the
fields how you want and /not/ use any Next Record fields. You would
typically have a blank paragraph at the end of your mail merge main
document. When Word merges, it should produce a new document that does not
have ppage breaks of any kind between the records.
If you really need to use a label type merge, then you do have to copy the
fields you have placed - each label in your layout needs its own copy of
those fields. There should be one Next record field before each "label"
except the first one.
Peter Jamieson
> Thank you. The .csv part worked - on MS Office Teacher-Student edition,
> which both the excel & Word documents were created in. It did not work on
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>> >
>> > Thanks,
dannie - 20 Feb 2007 12:50 GMT
Thank you so much!. Yes, I will work on it again today! But this should
take care of it I hope.
Thankyou!

Signature
dannie
> > It did not work on my
> > 2000 office.
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,