> What's even better is the user I'm helping understood the procedure as
> well :)
Absolutely :-)
> We tried it both ways. When we begin the merge from Outlook, we receive
> the
> message: "To use this feature, you must install the version of Microsoft
> Word that matches the installed version of Microsoft Office Outlook."
No way around that I suspect unless there is some clever registry tweak that
makes Word 2002 look like Word 2003 from Outlook's point of view. No idea,
but I doubt it.
> When we try it from Word, we choose Outlook Contacts but then she only
> sees
> the contacts of one of the attorneys she works for (where she is a
> delegate
> and can see them her contacts list from Outlook).
I have to say that that suggests to me that the Access method I suggested
may not be able to see all the necessary contacts either. I suppose you will
find out aas soon as you try it. I've never got to grips with the
"delegates" stuff in Exchange and have no idea what's going on internally.
The only thing I would suggest is that it /may/ make a difference what type
of Exchange connection she has, whether her .pst has been upgraded or not,
and perhaps whether her Outlook profile has been recreated or not.
Peter Jamieson
> What's even better is the user I'm helping understood the procedure as
> well :)
[quoted text clipped - 78 lines]
>> > easiest
>> > workaround?
DonnaP. - 07 Mar 2007 18:54 GMT
I didn't try re-creating her Outlook profile. You're right . . . that may do
the trick. Thanks for all your help today!
> > What's even better is the user I'm helping understood the procedure as
> > well :)
[quoted text clipped - 108 lines]
> >> > easiest
> >> > workaround?