 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWordDirectoryUser Groups Related Topics Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ... |
MS Office Forum / Word / Mailmerge and Fax / June 2007Future Date - Word 2000
Hello, I have to input a future date in a document. I got a peice of code from this forum a little whhile back to do it however, it doesn't format with the date ordinals. Does anyone have any suggestions to add the ordinals to the code please? Thanks, Chris See http://www.gmayor.com/insert_a_date_other_than_today.htm However, ordinal dates are even more complicated. See http://www.gmayor.com/formatting_word_fields.htm and the linked article from both.  Signature<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<> Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<> > Hello, > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Thanks, > Chris Thanks Graham. I had the code from Macropod's document already - all I have done is place it in the document twice, with the first set formatted "d"\*ordinal and the second formatted \@ "MMMM yyyy". This seems to have worked but I won't know for sure until I run the merge. Do you (or anyone else) forsee any problems with my logic? Thanks, Chris > See http://www.gmayor.com/insert_a_date_other_than_today.htm > However, ordinal dates are even more complicated. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Thanks, > > Chris That should work. I had a horrible feeling that you wanted superscripted ordinals :) Signature<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<> Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<> > Thanks Graham. I had the code from Macropod's document already - all > I have done is place it in the document twice, with the first set [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] >>> Thanks, >>> Chris No, no - don't like superscripting !) Thanks again for your help. > That should work. I had a horrible feeling that you wanted superscripted > ordinals :) [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > >>> Thanks, > >>> Chris |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.