Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Mailmerge and Fax / July 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Mail Merge Outcome Validation

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mushinma - 26 Jul 2007 17:02 GMT
I mail-merged 10 records of source data from MS Excel 2003 into an one page
MS Word 2003 template. The mail merge completed sucessfully with a 10-page
outcome Word file containing all records from the merge.

My question is: is there a way I can compare the merged data in the final
Word document with the original Excel data? In other words, if I have
firstName: A, B, C in the source Excel file, I want to know whether after the
mail merge value A, B, C is in the merged document with the exact value and
order as original.

Thanks in advance!!!
Doug Robbins - Word MVP - 27 Jul 2007 07:46 GMT
Most people have better things to do.  The only way to do it would be to
physically compare the data in Excel source with that in the document.

Signature

Hope this helps.

Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my
services on a paid consulting basis.

Doug Robbins - Word MVP

>I mail-merged 10 records of source data from MS Excel 2003 into an one page
> MS Word 2003 template. The mail merge completed sucessfully with a 10-page
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Thanks in advance!!!
Mushinma - 27 Jul 2007 14:56 GMT
The reason for this exercise is to fulfill some audit control purposes. The
current process in place is Person A performs the mail merge and then Person
B spot checks the mail merge result with original Excel data source. However,
a lot of time, the data to be merged could be large (up to 1000 separate
records), which makes the spot check really time consuming and cumbersome.

Signature

Learning InfoPath

> Most people have better things to do.  The only way to do it would be to
> physically compare the data in Excel source with that in the document.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> >
> > Thanks in advance!!!
Doug Robbins - Word MVP - 28 Jul 2007 01:13 GMT
I do not think that there is any other way of achieving the result.  Have
you ever found a discrepancy between the merged output and the data in
Excel?

Signature

Hope this helps.

Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my
services on a paid consulting basis.

Doug Robbins - Word MVP

> The reason for this exercise is to fulfill some audit control purposes.
> The
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance!!!
Mushinma - 28 Jul 2007 16:54 GMT
Thanks for getting back to me. I have not found any discrepancy between the
mail merge result and source data. However, there might be opportunities for
human manipulation after the mail merge. for instance, change Number A to
Number B in Word doc We are trying to do a final comparison before the mail
merge document become effective to catch the manipulation that has been done
to it to eliminate any error.
Signature

Learning InfoPath

> I do not think that there is any other way of achieving the result.  Have
> you ever found a discrepancy between the merged output and the data in
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> >> >
> >> > Thanks in advance!!!
Doug Robbins - Word MVP - 29 Jul 2007 10:59 GMT
Execute the merge directly to a printer and then the user will not have the
opportunity to change anything, or use the addin that you can down load from
http://www.gmayor.com/individual_merge_letters.htm and execute the merge to
separate .pdf files rather that Word documents.

But, if a user is likely to change the result of a merge, aren't they as
likely to change the data source?

Signature

Hope this helps.

Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my
services on a paid consulting basis.

Doug Robbins - Word MVP

> Thanks for getting back to me. I have not found any discrepancy between
> the
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks in advance!!!

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.