Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Mailmerge and Fax / November 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Outlook signature worked, now wrong colors and links not Underline

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
gbwealthy - 05 Nov 2007 20:40 GMT
Been using Outlook for mail and signature was working great, now I set up a
new sig and the color is incorrect, the links are not underlined, but when I
go to change it in options it is all correct. Never had this problem before.

I have done the fix and repair in Outlook. The only error I get has to do
with database and that is not a problem. I use OUTLOOK rather than Outlook
Express for the scheduling features not for the database integration.
Peter Jamieson - 06 Nov 2007 11:51 GMT
You probably need to ask this in an Outlook group - if it has something to
do with Word Mail merge, whichis the subject of this group, please spell it
out!

Signature

Peter Jamieson
http://tips.pjmsn.me.uk

> Been using Outlook for mail and signature was working great, now I set up
> a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> with database and that is not a problem. I use OUTLOOK rather than Outlook
> Express for the scheduling features not for the database integration.
gbwealthy - 06 Nov 2007 19:44 GMT
Thanks Peter, I entered this forum through "help" and followed trail to
OUTLOOK, but somehow ended here... lost! I do appreciate your answering my
question!

I did manage instead of changing an existing signature, I deleted and
created a new one and all seems to work.

So for now, that is my answer.

Best regards,
George

> You probably need to ask this in an Outlook group - if it has something to
> do with Word Mail merge, whichis the subject of this group, please spell it
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> > with database and that is not a problem. I use OUTLOOK rather than Outlook
> > Express for the scheduling features not for the database integration.
gbwealthy - 06 Nov 2007 19:48 GMT
and now I need to figure out how to delete this question. I really did not
notice I was in the wrong area. I clearly see the OUTLOOK link. That is
strange.

> You probably need to ask this in an Outlook group - if it has something to
> do with Word Mail merge, whichis the subject of this group, please spell it
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> > with database and that is not a problem. I use OUTLOOK rather than Outlook
> > Express for the scheduling features not for the database integration.
Doug Robbins - Word MVP - 07 Nov 2007 01:18 GMT
There is no way, or need to delete the question

Signature

Hope this helps.

Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my
services on a paid consulting basis.

Doug Robbins - Word MVP

> and now I need to figure out how to delete this question. I really did not
> notice I was in the wrong area. I clearly see the OUTLOOK link. That is
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>> > Outlook
>> > Express for the scheduling features not for the database integration.
Peter Jamieson - 07 Nov 2007 11:20 GMT
If you are going via the Microsoft Communities, you can try starting here:

http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/FlyoutOverview.mspx

Signature

Peter Jamieson
http://tips.pjmsn.me.uk

> and now I need to figure out how to delete this question. I really did not
> notice I was in the wrong area. I clearly see the OUTLOOK link. That is
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>> > Outlook
>> > Express for the scheduling features not for the database integration.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.