Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Mailmerge and Fax / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Missing Records

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
FarGardener - 14 May 2008 21:32 GMT
I recently did a mail merge of names of diners and a brief bio of each person
for a booklet to accompany a dinner, using data from an Excel spreadsheet.  
The first time the mail merge returned about 40 records, just less than half
the number that it should have.  The second time it returned four short of
the required number and the third time I tried there were three records
missing.  I am using Word and Excel 2007.

The next day I used the same spreadsheet to mail merge the names of diners
onto place cards, and it worked perfectly!

Has anyone come across this and is there a solution?  I use mail merge a
huge amount and need to be able to trust that the records returned will be
correct.

Thanks
Signature


FarGardener

Doug Robbins - Word MVP - 14 May 2008 23:42 GMT
I have never heard of irregularities such as that.  The usual cause is the
inclusion of a <<Next Record>> field where one is not required.

Signature

Hope this helps.

Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my
services on a paid consulting basis.

Doug Robbins - Word MVP

>I recently did a mail merge of names of diners and a brief bio of each
>person
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Thanks
FarGardener - 15 May 2008 13:51 GMT
Yes, I came across this problem many years ago but it isn't relevant in this
case as the <<Next record>> fields were correctly positioned.  The merge also
changed my font and font size, but only for 2 or 3 records.  The whole thing
was very weird!
Signature


FarGardener

> I have never heard of irregularities such as that.  The usual cause is the
> inclusion of a <<Next Record>> field where one is not required.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> >
> > Thanks
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.