Hi Dave,
On the assumption that you have executed the merge to a new document, and
that document contains all of the pages, then the problem would not be
related to mailmerge. I am not sure what is causing it.
However, each letter produced by executing a mailmerge to a new document is
in a separate Section so that to get a particular page (=Section) to print,
it is necessary to specify the Section number rather than the page number.
This is done by placing an s before the number as in
s2, s5-s7, etc.
Please post any further questions or followup to the newsgroups for the
benefit of others who may be interested. Unsolicited questions forwarded
directly to me will only be answered on a paid consulting basis.
Hope this helps
Doug Robbins - Word MVP
> using ME and office 2000, i have created a form letter and
> merged an excel worksheet filled with addresses and all
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> any ideas for me to try?
> thanks.
Mark Nelson - 23 Dec 2003 23:51 GMT
Thanks for this reply. This is exactly the situation I ran into today. I wanted to reprint a specific range of pages from my merged document. Word did nothing when I gave it the range of pages to print. Finally I noticed in the status bar that I had one page with many many sections. Unfortunately, at the time I had no idea how to print a range of sections.
Has the Word team simply given up on making Mail Merge usable by the masses? I do about six mail merges a month, and I still have way more troublesome merges than smooth merges.
Graham Mayor - 24 Dec 2003 06:16 GMT
See http://www.gmayor.com/mail_merge_labels_with_word_xp.htm which covers
merges fairly comprehensively.

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
E-mail gmayor@mvps.org
Web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site www.mvps.org/word
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
> Thanks for this reply. This is exactly the situation I ran into
> today. I wanted to reprint a specific range of pages from my merged
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> masses? I do about six mail merges a month, and I still have way
> more troublesome merges than smooth merges.