Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Mailmerge and Fax / January 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

merging from excell

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ad - 10 Jan 2004 16:30 GMT
When merging from an excell sheet none of the number
formatting is retained.  This used to be fine in Word
2000.
Graham Mayor - 10 Jan 2004 16:45 GMT
The default way that the two connect has been changed, and now Word is
expected to provide the formatting, but see the excel data section of
http://www.gmayor.com/mail_merge_labels_with_word_xp.htm and
http://www.gmayor.com/formatting_word_fields.htm to learn how to do it the
old way and a workaround respectively.

Signature

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
    Graham Mayor -  Word MVP
      E-mail gmayor@mvps.org
     Web site www.gmayor.com
 Word MVP web site www.mvps.org/word
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>

> When merging from an excell sheet none of the number
> formatting is retained.  This used to be fine in Word
> 2000.
yourbestfriend - 10 Jan 2004 23:46 GMT
The easiest method to keep all formatting when merging data from excel to word is to turn on the "prescsion as displayed" option in the options - Caluculation box under the tools menu.

This way all data as displayed on your worksheet will be merged into the word document and all formating such as forulma rounding up and deceimel placing etc are not lost in the transfer.
Graham Mayor - 11 Jan 2004 06:51 GMT
Thanks for reminding us of this option - an extra note on my web page is
indicated :)

It is certainly an alternative method if you have access to Excel (and not
merely the file) but I wonder whether it is always desirable to reduce the
precision of Excel's calculations in this manner - Microsoft obviously
doesn't think so as the option is off by default - and was this option
always available in Excel?

The main issue here is that Microsoft has changed the default method Word
uses to connect to its data, and thus Word is expected to provide any
formatting. This gives the user control over the appearance of the data in
the merge document. Alternatively it is still possible to use the older
connection method which eliminates the problem.

Signature

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
    Graham Mayor -  Word MVP
      E-mail gmayor@mvps.org
     Web site www.gmayor.com
 Word MVP web site www.mvps.org/word
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>

> The easiest method to keep all formatting when merging data from
> excel to word is to turn on the "prescsion as displayed" option in
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the word document and all formating such as forulma rounding up and
> deceimel placing etc are not lost in the transfer.
- 12 Jan 2004 13:01 GMT
I have found that two digit decimals in Excel suddenly end
up being 15 digit decimals in the merged word document.  
The way I solved it is with reference to article 304387 on
the Microsoft Knowledge Base articles.  You have to
firstly right click on the merge field and select the
toggle (or press Alt + 9) and then define the 'switch'
after the field description.  Thus in my case the toggle
field read {MERGEFIELD "amount"} and I changed it to
{MERGEFIELD "Amount"\#,###0.00} and it then limited the
merge to the required two decimals.

HIH.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.