> 1. This is an Access table created via the taskpane wizard, step 3, type a
> new list (not sure about the wording here).
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> I sincerely hope I have been more clear than the first time. Hopefully you
> will be able to help me.
Cindy,
Thanks for all your efforts trying to solve my problem. Talk about
comittment !!! I have been reading the newsgroup for quite a while now and
have always found your answers to be 100% accurate. So if you do not find a
solution chances are no-one will.
As you mentioned in your reply problems do tend to be less when one takes
the queries one by one, repeating the whole merge from scratch. I have been
teaching Word starting with version 6 and have always had problems with
this, but never as much as in version Word 2002. I also realise that the way
I tackle these queries maybe what is causing the trouble. You could call
this heavy duty work as I am obviously pushing Word to the limit. It is my
opinion that a well written peace of software should allow to do this. Users
often perform a query and find the end result does not meet their criteria
and go back to do a better job.
Removing ALL criteria did help in previous versions of Word. Not so in Word
2002.
I had allready taken into consideration your suggestion to put the mailmerge
command in the toolbar, but decided against it because this means reverting
to a previous version of Word. People learning Word from scratch have
difficulties understanding why there should be different ways or procedures
to follow in performing a task. For people updating from a previous version
this could be valuable and an alternative to consider.
One question concerning the macro you suggested, should it be performed
after every query you perform or only when the problem occurs? I will test
it and see if this solves the issue and report back.
Again, Cindy, thanks for investing your time in this.
Luc
"Cindy M -WordMVP-" <C.Meister-C@hispeed.ch> schreef in bericht
news:VA.00009288.00fb6af9@speedy...
> Hi Luc,
>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or
> reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)
Cindy M -WordMVP- - 22 Jan 2004 18:59 GMT
Hi Luc,
> So if you do not find a
> solution chances are no-one will.
Oh, that's not said :-) Often, it can turn out to be a matter of a different
point of view, or a particular experience. In this case, however, I do
imagine we're running into some kind of "memory leak"...
> You could call
> this heavy duty work as I am obviously pushing Word to the limit. It is my
> opinion that a well written peace of software should allow to do this.
Oh, no question about that; I agree with you completely. If the question
came up more often, something might even be done about it :-) FWIW, this is
the first time I've heard of it, so it probably isn't at the top of the "bug
hit list" <g> The other factor is reproducibility. If a problem can't be
reproduced with some reliability, it's very difficult to track down the
possible cause. And memory leaks are especially elusive...
> Removing ALL criteria did help in previous versions of Word. Not so in Word
> 2002.
Now *that's* interesting. It makes me wonder how much the connection method
(OLE DB vs DDE?) has to do with the problem? Or using an Access database
instead of a Word table?
> One question concerning the macro you suggested, should it be performed
> after every query you perform or only when the problem occurs? I will test
> it and see if this solves the issue and report back.
Either way. I'd first try "just when it glitches", though.
Cindy Meister
INTER-Solutions, Switzerland
http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Sep 30 2003)
http://www.word.mvps.org
This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or
reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)
Peter Jamieson - 23 Jan 2004 09:24 GMT
Something that might help you pinpoint what is happening (even if it does
not help fix the problem) is to save your merge document in HTML format. If
you then open it as a text file you can see what Word has set up as the
mailmerge source, query, etc.
BTW this was also orginally a suggestion from Cindy :-)
--
Peter Jamieson - Word MVP
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org/
> Cindy,
> Thanks for all your efforts trying to solve my problem. Talk about
[quoted text clipped - 105 lines]
> > This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or
> > reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)