Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Mailmerge and Fax / January 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Merging data to Check box fields

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Keith Robertson - 19 Jan 2004 12:38 GMT
Hi,

I am trying to merge binary (True / False) data into a
word doc and have it appear as a check box. It is
formatted in the query I am using as such, but appears in
Word as True or False.

Is there any way to get around this problem.

Much obliged for any help.

Keith
Graham Mayor - 19 Jan 2004 12:53 GMT
Should be easy enough. Enter the checked box character you require in your
document eg from the Wingdings 2 font and format it at the size you require
it to be in your merge document. Display the formatting characters (CTRL+*)
and select the character BUT NOT the paragraph mark. Save as an autotext
entry - Checkit.  Do the same for the unchecked character and call that
Uncheckit.

Then in your merge document use a conditional field

{IF {Mergefield Fieldname} = "True" "{Autotext Checkit}" "{Autotext
Uncheckit}"}

Signature

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
    Graham Mayor -  Word MVP
      E-mail gmayor@mvps.org
     Web site www.gmayor.com
 Word MVP web site www.mvps.org/word
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Keith
Cindy M  -WordMVP- - 19 Jan 2004 19:03 GMT
Hi Graham,

Actually, it doesn't even need to be part of an AutoText entry. The symbol
can be inserted directly into the IF field.

> Should be easy enough. Enter the checked box character you require in your
> document eg from the Wingdings 2 font and format it at the size you require
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> {IF {Mergefield Fieldname} = "True" "{Autotext Checkit}" "{Autotext
> Uncheckit}"}

Cindy Meister
INTER-Solutions, Switzerland
http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Sep 30 2003)
http://www.word.mvps.org

This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or
reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)
Graham Mayor - 20 Jan 2004 07:57 GMT
I knew that, but where there are differences in formatting sizes to the
underlying text, autotext is perhaps an easier concept to convey in a plain
text message - and of course the technique has much wider application than
simply a  checkbox character :)

Signature

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
    Graham Mayor -  Word MVP
      E-mail gmayor@mvps.org
     Web site www.gmayor.com
 Word MVP web site www.mvps.org/word
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>

Cindy M -WordMVP- wrote:

> Hi Graham,
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow
> question or reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)
Keith Robertson - 23 Jan 2004 12:31 GMT
Thanks to you both, I finally got it to work. The Curly
braces (Cntl+F9) were confusing.
A quick follow up, when merging a large number of
documents sometimes the check boxes do not update so you
get blank space instead of a checked or unchecked box. If
you right click the space and click Update Field it puts
the appropriate symbol in.
Any thoughts on that problem.

Thanks Keith

>-----Original Message-----
>I knew that, but where there are differences in formatting sizes to the
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
>.
Cindy M  -WordMVP- - 23 Jan 2004 17:47 GMT
Hi Keith,

> A quick follow up, when merging a large number of
> documents sometimes the check boxes do not update so you
> get blank space instead of a checked or unchecked box. If
> you right click the space and click Update Field it puts
> the appropriate symbol in.
> Any thoughts on that problem.

Does Ctrl+A, F9 in the merged result doc also work?

Cindy Meister
INTER-Solutions, Switzerland
http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Sep
30 2003)
http://www.word.mvps.org

This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any
follow question or reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail
:-)
Keith Robertson - 27 Jan 2004 16:00 GMT
Yes that works too great Thanks.
>-----Original Message-----
>Hi Keith,
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.