Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Mailmerge and Fax / February 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

mailmerqe question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
fry - 13 Feb 2004 09:20 GMT
hi ,

I have next year have some probleme with word XP on mailmerge with more than
255 field , word XP crashes and is very slow.
(I have referenced this bug to Microsoft)

i haven't problem with word 2000 and 97.

I would like to know if this problem will be solved in word 2003.

Thank's for help
Doug Robbins - Word MVP - DELETE UPPERCASE CHARACTERS FROM EMAIL ADDRESS - 13 Feb 2004 10:11 GMT
What are you using as the datasource?  With Access and Excel, you will be
limited to that number of fields.  With a comma delimited file, you should
be able to use more.

Signature

Please post any further questions or followup to the newsgroups for the
benefit of others who may be interested.  Unsolicited questions forwarded
directly to me will only be answered on a paid consulting basis.
Hope this helps
Doug Robbins - Word MVP

> hi ,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Thank's for help
fry - 13 Feb 2004 10:16 GMT
hi ,

thank's for help

I use a texte file with comma delimited but i have 3000 fields , in wird 97
the fusion take 3 second in word XP 4 minutes.

So is it more fast with word 2003 ?

thank's

> What are you using as the datasource?  With Access and Excel, you will be
> limited to that number of fields.  With a comma delimited file, you should
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> >
> > Thank's for help
Cindy M  -WordMVP- - 13 Feb 2004 19:20 GMT
Hi Fry,

Your two message contradict one another a bit. Is Word crashing, or is it only
slow?

1. If you try to display the Recipients dialog box with more than 286 fields,
Word 2002 will crash. This is a known bug. Use the toolbar or the old mail
merge Helper interface to link to the data source.

2. By default, Word 2002 uses OLE DB to connect to the data, and OLE DB is
measurably slower than the connection methods used in earlier versions. This
has not changed in Word 2003.

For this, activate "Confirm conversions on open" in Tools/Options/General. Now
you'll get a choice of the connection method; I suggest Word's internal text
file converter.

> I use a texte file with comma delimited but i have 3000 fields , in wird 97
> the fusion take 3 second in word XP 4 minutes.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> > >
> > > I would like to know if this problem will be solved in word 2003.

Cindy Meister
INTER-Solutions, Switzerland
http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Sep 30 2003)
http://www.word.mvps.org

This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or
reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.