I am on the limit of wanting to give some useably designer
in MS a real up-front close encounter with usability
feedback. What I am trying to do is...
Merge a small (20 record?) Excel spreadsheet set-up as a
merge source document with an MS Word document. I'm using
Win2K and Word/Excel 2000. I've done this more times than
I care to remember, but tonight...
No matter what format the source document I try, be it in
Excel .xls, tab or comma delimited .txt, Word table .doc
format or anything else I can try, as soon as I try and
define my source document to a Word merge document I am
told; "The merged document contains unmarked changes. Do
you want to merge up to the first unmarked change?" This
is clever especially when we're talking about a simply
comma or tab delimited file!
Excuse me, but quite what the ... is this meant to mean? I
have a simple file. The number of cells/tabs/commas
(select as appropriate to the numerous file formats I've
tried) are correct, i.e. each row has the correct number
of columns, but still word will not have it. It would be
easier, quicker and better for my blood pressure to simply
type the merge long-hand.
Quite what is going on? What is it about tonight that
means Word has decided not to play? Things used to be so
easy in the bad old days when you typed up your merge
document long-hand inserting the fields manually. Now it
all has to be 'easy', and with that so much doesn't seem
to work as it should :-(
Anyone any ideas?
.../Iain
Susan Baker - 08 Mar 2004 00:30 GMT
Are you possibly using tools \ merge documents instead of tools \ mail
merge?
you should never see that particular message in relation to mail merge.
> I am on the limit of wanting to give some useably designer
> in MS a real up-front close encounter with usability
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> .../Iain
Graham Mayor - 08 Mar 2004 04:55 GMT
Microsoft does not monitor this newsgroup so a rant at Microsoft here will
not help.
As for the error message, this is probably because you have tools > track
changes selected.
I note that you complain things were better when fields were inserted by
hand. If you prefer this method, use it. I always build my merges manually.
Use CTRL+F9 to set field boundaries and enter the fields by hand eg
{Mergefield fieldname}

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
Web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site www.mvps.org/word
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
> I am on the limit of wanting to give some useably designer
> in MS a real up-front close encounter with usability
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> .../Iain