Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Mailmerge and Fax / May 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Time switches/formats

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Frank - 06 May 2004 11:51 GMT
When I try to merge a time field (11am) into word it is diplayed as '1899-12-30 11:00:00' and not '11am' as I would like. I have tried inserting the switch \@ "hh:mm am/pm" into the toggled field code but this make no differance. can anyone explain what is wrong and how to fix this apparent bug
Cindy M  -WordMVP- - 06 May 2004 15:12 GMT
Hi =?Utf-8?B?RnJhbms=?=,

> When I try to merge a time field (11am) into word it is diplayed as '1899-12-30 11:00:00' and not '11am' as I would like. I have tried inserting the switch \@ "hh:mm am/pm" into the toggled field code but this make no differance.

1. which version of Word is this?
2. What's the data source?
3. If you know: what data connection method did you use?

Cindy Meister
INTER-Solutions, Switzerland
http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Sep 30 2003)
http://www.word.mvps.org

This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)
Peter Jamieson - 06 May 2004 15:52 GMT
I think the problem here is that Word does not recognise '1899-12-30
11:00:00' as a date because of the year. If it was 1901 or later, your
switch would work correctly.

Your best bet is to fix this in the data source. If you let us know what
that is (and which version of Word), we may be able to help.

Signature

Peter Jamieson

> When I try to merge a time field (11am) into word it is diplayed as '1899-12-30 11:00:00' and not '11am' as I would like. I have tried inserting
the switch \@ "hh:mm am/pm" into the toggled field code but this make no
differance. can anyone explain what is wrong and how to fix this apparent
bug?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.