
Signature
Please post any further questions or followup to the newsgroups for the
benefit of others who may be interested. Unsolicited questions forwarded
directly to me will only be answered on a paid consulting basis.
Hope this helps
> Thanks for the response, Doug.
> Re your first suggestion -
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
> >
> >.
I already tried it outside the text boxes. What happens
then is, no matter where, physically, you place the "NEXT"
field code relative to the text boxes, the fields in both
the text boxes end up containing the same data, as I
mentioned in my original mail, and the data item that is
first in the data file is skipped altogether.
My current best guess as to what seems to happen is :-
when the main document is scanned by Word, the text layer
is scanned first, and any fields found are sorted out.
Then, the text boxes get looked at (and they are treated,
for some reason beyond me, like headers [or some such]).
That, I think, would explain why, when the "NEXT" is
placed outside the text boxes, the first of the data items
is skipped, wouldn't it?
>-----Original Message-----
>If you can't use the second method, then you will have to re-arrange the
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
>
>.
Graham Mayor - 23 May 2004 15:35 GMT
Don't use text boxes, use frames or table cells.

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site www.mvps.org/word
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><
> I already tried it outside the text boxes. What happens
> then is, no matter where, physically, you place the "NEXT"
[quoted text clipped - 90 lines]
>>
>> .
john attwood - 23 May 2004 17:53 GMT
Frames are the answer!!
Well done that man!
Many thanks
John Attwood
>-----Original Message-----
>Don't use text boxes, use frames or table cells.
[quoted text clipped - 95 lines]
>
>.