Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Mailmerge and Fax / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Mail merge to Excel

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
james - 18 Jun 2004 15:20 GMT
When I merge data from an Excel sheet, only the first 259
characters are retrieved in any particular field. Is this
a known problem - any fixes (other than splitting the data
between 2 fields)?

I'm using Office 2003.

Thanks
Cindy M  -WordMVP- - 20 Jun 2004 09:53 GMT
Hi James,

> When I merge data from an Excel sheet, only the first 259
> characters are retrieved in any particular field. Is this
> a known problem - any fixes (other than splitting the data
> between 2 fields)? Office 2003

This is a known problem, yes. But I think you might be able
to get around it by changing the connection method; worth a
try, anyway.

Tools/Options/General, activate "Confirm conversions on
open".

Now try the four possible connection methods offered after
you've selected the data source. for these tests, your merge
data needs to be on the first sheet, top-left, of the
workbook. OLE DB is the one that's not working for you,
currently (the default).

Cindy Meister
INTER-Solutions, Switzerland
http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Jun
8 2004)
http://www.word.mvps.org

This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow
question or reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)
james - 22 Jun 2004 09:49 GMT
DDE solved the problem, but only seemed to pick up the
first 16 columns in the data source. I'm able to get
round this quite easily though.

Thanks for your help.

James
>-----Original Message-----
>Hi James,
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
>.
Cindy M  -WordMVP- - 22 Jun 2004 10:56 GMT
Hi James,

> DDE solved the problem, but only seemed to pick up the
> first 16 columns in the data source. I'm able to get
> round this quite easily though.

FWIW, it should pick up a lot more than 16 columns. Might
be a problem with an empty column in between, or a "bad"
field name?

Cindy Meister
INTER-Solutions, Switzerland
http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update
Jun 8 2004)
http://www.word.mvps.org

This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any
follow question or reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail
:-)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.