Well, you really need to spell out /all/ the different possible cases,
because it isn't completely clear how the new cases relate to the situation
you already had. If you did that, you might find it easier to work out the
various nested statements for yourself - it's simple logic.
Also, if there are many more cases, it may make sense to try to generate the
text in your data source or, e.g. in an Access query.
e.g....
> ...AND CELL 4 reads "CA", then enter "testing"
Which of the following do you mean:
a. if cell1,2,3 are all blank but cell4 is CA, use "testing". In all other
cases, use 888
b. if one of cell1,2,3 is non-blank, use 888. In addition, if cell4 is
"CA", add "testing"
c. whatever the value of cell1,2,3, if cell4 is "CA", add "testing"
?
For (a), try:
{ IF "{ MERGEFIELD cell1 }{ MERGEFIELD cell2 }{ MERGEFIELD cell3 }" = ""
"{ IF "{ MERGEFIELD cell4 }" = "CA" "testing" "" }"
"888" }
For (b), try
{ IF "{ MERGEFIELD cell1 }{ MERGEFIELD cell2 }{ MERGEFIELD cell3 }" = ""
""
"888{ IF "{ MERGEFIELD cell4}" = "CA" "testing" "" }" }
For (c), try the obvious:
{ IF "{ MERGEFIELD cell1 }{ MERGEFIELD cell2 }{ MERGEFIELD cell3 }" = ""
""
"888" }{ { IF "{ MERGEFIELD cell4}" = "CA" "testing" "" }
> 2) IF CELL 1 AND CELL 2 ARE NOT BLANK, OR CELL 3 IS NOT
> EQUAL TO 777, ENTER PHRASE "TESTING"
How does this case relate to the other cases you have described?
(NB, I'll be away for a few days).

Signature
Peter Jamieson
> WOW, that's great help, I have two more scenarios that
> relate:
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> >
> >.
santi - 15 Jul 2004 17:08 GMT
Thank you very much for such valuable info!! I have, I
promise, the last scenario I need help with:
If either CELL 1, CELL 2 or CELL 3 is NOT blank, OR if
CELL 4 is NOT EQUAL to 'Service Plan', enter "ok to
proceed", otherwise don't enter anything.
Thank you very much in advance, this has taken me about 4
days of research already!
>-----Original Message-----
>Well, you really need to spell out /all/ the different possible cases,
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
>
>.
Graham Mayor - 16 Jul 2004 06:40 GMT
Fellow MVP Greg Maxey has answered this in one of your other threads on this
subject - to avoid this disassociation is the reason for keeping related
messages in the same thread. No one objects to answering your questions in
any quantity, provided you supply the information required to enable us to
do so.

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
> Thank you very much for such valuable info!! I have, I
> promise, the last scenario I need help with:
[quoted text clipped - 85 lines]
>>
>> .