Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Mailmerge and Fax / September 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Date mergefield problem!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Damon - 21 Sep 2004 12:01 GMT
Hi,

When using date switch in Word 2002 i.e. @ "MMMM yyyy" on a Windows XP
machine it prints out as required e.g. April 2003, however when printing the
exact same document on a Windows NT machine it prints out as January 2003,
which I gather means it is taking it as American format instead of UK.  I
have checked the regional setting on the Windows NT machine and they are set
to UK but still prints out as January 2003.  Any ideas on this really
frustrating problem would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Damon
Graham Mayor - 21 Sep 2004 14:33 GMT
What are you trying to say here? That America is a few months behind? ;)

The date switch you have illustrated should produce the month - spelled out
in full, followed by the year as four digits. The regional settings
shouldn't affect this.

If the field is producing a different date altogether ie January instead of
April, then the field or the data it refers to is the problem rather than
the switch (which is working correctly) where is the field getting its
information from and what is the rest of the field?

Signature

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor -  Word MVP

My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Damon
Damon - 21 Sep 2004 16:28 GMT
Hi,

Thanks for replying.  The data source is an Excel 2002 spreadsheet, when I
view the data in there it is laid out as 01/04/2004, this should then go
into Word using my switch as APRIL 2004 which it does when using my Windows
XP machine but goes in as JANUARY 2004 when using the Windows NT machine.
It's obviously nothing to do with the data source other wise I would have
the same problem on the XP machine.  Is certainly a stange one.  Appreciate
any advice.

Thanks

Damon
> What are you trying to say here? That America is a few months behind? ;)
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> >
> > Damon
Peter Jamieson - 21 Sep 2004 17:28 GMT
This is probably down to an error in the OLEDB provider for Excel, which is
what Word 2002 will be using to connect to Excel unless you deliberately
connected using DDE, ODBC, or the Excel converter The problem has been
around for a while. See

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;327579

As for why Word behaves differently on NT and XP, I don't know, but maybe
a. you have installed the relevant SP on one machine but not the other or
b. there are different versions of the OLEDB provider on the two machines
and one works, one doesn't.

Signature

Peter Jamieson

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> > >
> > > Damon
mdraino@hotmail.com - 23 Sep 2004 07:57 GMT
We had the same problem here in Australia.
Try this:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;304387

Also untick the preserve formatting box when adding this
to the field.

Mike

>-----Original Message-----
>This is probably down to an error in the OLEDB provider for Excel, which is
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
>.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.