
Signature
Greg Maxey/Word MVP
A Peer in Peer to Peer Support
Greg,
I edited my statement to how you have it shown and when I update the field
it shows the False condition, but when I actually do the mail merge with my
data source, I get no results....not even my false condition. The logic
makes sense. I've broken out each IF MF on a seperate line to verify the
data is correct which it is. Thanks for your help. I forgot to mention this
is Word 2002.
Rushak.
> Rushak,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> > "VA" "The result when the condition is met" "The result when the
> > condition is not met"}"}
Greg Maxey - 06 Nov 2004 01:10 GMT
Rushak,
As far as I can tell the construction is right. You might try confirming
your construction with a few bookmarks and REF fields located in your
document. If you can make that work, then substitute the REF fields with
your merge fields.

Signature
Greg Maxey/Word MVP
A Peer in Peer to Peer Support
> Greg,
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>>> "VA" "The result when the condition is met" "The result when the
>>> condition is not met"}"}
Graham Mayor - 06 Nov 2004 09:59 GMT
I assume that you have used CTRL+F9 to set each pair of field boundaries? If
so, Greg's construction should work - to clarify, using your original
example and assuming that OR and VA are actual results both of which need to
be true:
{IF {MERGEFIELD PropertyState} = "OR" "{IF {MERGEFIELD Investor} = "VA" "The
result when the condition is met" "The result when the condition is not
met"}"The result when the condition is not met"}
It might help to insert a {Mergefield PropertyState} field and a {Mergefield
Investor} field in your merge document to ensure that they do actually
produce OR and VA.

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
> Greg,
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>>> "VA" "The result when the condition is met" "The result when the
>>> condition is not met"}"}