Data files are processed sequentially.
The best you are likely to achieve readily is to remove every other next
record field which will produce the labels in pairs, but immediately
following one another.

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> kristofer
The only way to do this with mailmerge would be to execute the merge twice
with two specially set up main documents. In the first document, delete the
merge fields from the 5th through 8th labels and in the second, delete them
form the 1st through 4th labels and the <<Next>> field from in front of the
first mailmerge field in the 5th label.
After executing the first merge, you will need to re-load the sheets into
the printer in the correct order for the second.

Signature
Please respond to the Newsgroup for the benefit of others who may be
interested. Questions sent directly to me will only be answered on a paid
consulting basis.
Hope this helps,
Doug Robbins - Word MVP
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> kristofer
KristoferMc - 17 Jan 2005 10:43 GMT
the merge is a little more complex than the example i used, so the two run
option is not applicable.
so are you saying that there is no function in word that allows you to
return to a previous record?
> The only way to do this with mailmerge would be to execute the merge twice
> with two specially set up main documents. In the first document, delete the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> >
> > kristofer
Peter Jamieson - 17 Jan 2005 11:29 GMT
> so are you saying that there is no function in word that allows you to
> return to a previous record?
There is no such function.
Another approach you can try is to store the values of the fields you are
using in bookmarks using SET fields, and re-using them with REF fields.
e.g. let's suppose you want to repeat the first two labels rather than the
first four, and your label uses field f. Try something like
label 1:
{ SET F1 { MERGEFIELD F
}{ MERGEFIELD F }
label 2:
{ NEXT }{ SET F2 { MERGEFIELD F
}{ MERGEFIELD F }
label 3:
{ REF F1 }
label 4:
{ REF F2 }
Peter Jamieson
> the merge is a little more complex than the example i used, so the two run
> option is not applicable.
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>> >
>> > kristofer