The mail merge in XP and later is totally clunky and over-complicated. There
are many more steps in XP/2003 to get the same results as in 2000. The mail
merge in 2000 worked just fine - why was it changed? This is why I hate
"upgrading" - the useful features get changed and the real bugs don't.
I want the superior old style mail merge back. And that goes for inserting
pictures and clip art too - more steps to the same end.
You can use the old methods still -
http://www.gmayor.com/mail_merge_labels_with_word_xp.htm
There is no difference in the insertion of graphics - the drawing canvas can
be turned off from tools > options if not required.

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
> The mail merge in XP and later is totally clunky and
> over-complicated. There are many more steps in XP/2003 to get the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I want the superior old style mail merge back. And that goes for
> inserting pictures and clip art too - more steps to the same end.