There are many advantages to merging in Word 2003, but there are also parts
that now take much more time. Previously, one could easily select a merge
field on the fly, while creating the document. I could quickly add
punctuation, spacing, partial sentences, etc. Now I am out of the document
when I select the merge fields to be incorporated. It takes several extra
keystrokes to insert a variety of fields, especially if the fields are being
inserted into the text of the document.
I have been a heavy user of mail merging for 15 years, and find this to be a
step backward.
Graham Mayor - 11 Jul 2005 15:54 GMT
http://www.gmayor.com/mail_merge_labels_with_word_xp.htm s hould put you
back on track.

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
> There are many advantages to merging in Word 2003, but there are also
> parts that now take much more time. Previously, one could easily
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=4bdb7cd8-26d1-4
52c-966c-edd203c1446a&dg=microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
Jim Hawkins - 12 Jul 2005 19:55 GMT
> There are many advantages to merging in Word 2003, but there are also
> parts
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> a
> step backward.
Agreed. Word2000 got it about right.
Jim Hawkins