Okay, Nat. So what does your merge field look like when you view it? Also,
what's the cell format in Excel?
*******************
~Anne Troy
www.OfficeArticles.com
> Thank you for the response Anne, but it doesn't quite get at my problem. My
> problem is that the merge feature is ADDING a zero in fron of some numbers -
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> > This may help, Nat:
Hi Anne.
My goal is for the merged data to appear as numbers that look something like
2,300, 75, etc. The dilemma is that, thus far, I have not been able to
achieve that outcome using switch codes - it seems that I must sacrifice one
of three things. First, when using a switch code "\#0" I can obtain the
desired effect, but no commas are present. If I use "\#,#" then mergefields
for which the data source reports a zero are ommitted in the merged document.
If I use "\#0 #,#" then no commas appear. If I modify slightly by "\#0#,#" I
get my zeros and commas, but data in the MSExcel document that are the
product of a formula, e.g. "=sum(A1:A4)" AND are less than three digits, e.g.
45, are presented as "045."
Thus far, I have not been able to find the right combination of switches
that will give me: commas, viewable data-source zero-value-entries, AND
properly formatted merge results, e.g. 45, that is the product of a formula
in the source document. I simply don't know what other switches or solutions
might be available. Thank you for any assistance or solution you might be
able to provide.
Nat
If I want the commas then I have to accept numbers like "075."
Alternatively, I can get the number to look like "75" but then I can't get
the commas. And yet another alternative, I can indeed get the commas and the
two digit numbers looking right, but I will lose other merged values for
which a zero is entered in the spreadsheet.
I am using an MSExcel file as the source document and merging to an MSWrod
document. The situation occurs for a couple of cells, all with the same
structure. First, the MSExcel content is the result of a formula, e.g.
"=sum(s3:s9)."
Second, result of the formula is a two digit number, e.g. 59. When the
number is three digits there is no problem. In the MSWord document, an
example of a problematic merge field (when viewed with the F9 toggle) is {
MERGEFIELD "Total_Revenue" }. The result looks something like "059." I have
tried a couple of switches in hopes of getting the appearance I want but can
never get every thing I want. For example, { MERGEFIELD "Total_Revenue" \#0
} gives "59," but when I try to include a switch that will format using
commas in larger numbers { MERGEFIELD "Total_Revenue" \#0 #,#} it goes back
to "059."
solutions but I have not been able to get the
> Okay, Nat. So what does your merge field look like when you view it? Also,
> what's the cell format in Excel?
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> be
> > > > helpful. Thank you
Peter Jamieson - 21 Jul 2005 17:19 GMT
Did you try \#,0
?
Peter Jamieson
> Hi Anne.
> My goal is for the merged data to appear as numbers that look something
[quoted text clipped - 106 lines]
>> be
>> > > > helpful. Thank you
Nat - 22 Jul 2005 13:12 GMT
That's the answer! Thank you Peter!
> Did you try \#,0
> ?
[quoted text clipped - 110 lines]
> >> be
> >> > > > helpful. Thank you