Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Mailmerge and Fax / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Number each label in the mail merge step so it is done automatical

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sagit - 16 Aug 2005 04:43 GMT
I have a file with 150 names.  I would like to number each name 1- 150
automatically in a label mail merge.  I go to Insert, Field, click on
numbering, then listnum, then number each label, 1-20, on the mail merge
page, then update labels.  After I merge, I get each page of labels numbered
1 - 20.  Is there a way to have my labels of names numbered 1 thru 150  
without having to manually number them myself after the merge?  Thank you for
any help you can give me.
Signature

S Jan

Doug Robbins - 16 Aug 2005 05:16 GMT
Modify the merge datasource so that it contains a field with the numbers.
Easiest way to do this would be to out it into Excel.

Signature

Hope this helps.

Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my
services on a paid consulting basis.

Doug Robbins - Word MVP

>I have a file with 150 names.  I would like to number each name 1- 150
> automatically in a label mail merge.  I go to Insert, Field, click on
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> for
> any help you can give me.
Sagit - 16 Aug 2005 05:55 GMT
Doug: The source program that creates the original table is so old, that I
have to go thru 5 steps (delete delimiters, replace paragraph with tab,
convert to text to table, convert table back to text, save as a text file)
just to get it in an acceptable form for Excel.  For a Word table, all I have
to do is change the record and field delimiters.  I may be forced to use
Excel, but if you have any other suggestions, please let me know.  Thanks for
so much.
Signature

S Jan

> Modify the merge datasource so that it contains a field with the numbers.
> Easiest way to do this would be to out it into Excel.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> > for
> > any help you can give me.
Sagit - 16 Aug 2005 14:58 GMT
Doug,
I went ahead and got the file in a format that was acceptable to Access
(Access automatically numbered each  record) and did a mail merge with that.  
A strange thing happened: the first page of labels was numbered 1-20; the
second page was numbered 2-21, the third page 3-22, etc.  Access has each
record numbered 1-150, so I can't figure that one out.  Any ideas?  Thanks
for you help.
Signature

S Jan

> Modify the merge datasource so that it contains a field with the numbers.
> Easiest way to do this would be to out it into Excel.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> > for
> > any help you can give me.
Graham Mayor - 16 Aug 2005 05:20 GMT
See http://www.gmayor.com/Numbered_labels.htm

Signature

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor -  Word MVP

My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>

> I have a file with 150 names.  I would like to number each name 1- 150
> automatically in a label mail merge.  I go to Insert, Field, click on
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> numbered 1 thru 150 without having to manually number them myself
> after the merge?  Thank you for any help you can give me.
Sagit - 16 Aug 2005 05:49 GMT
I did the Insert, Field, {SEQ Label}, but still got labels numbered 1-20 on
each sheet of labels.  What did I do wrong?
Signature

S Jan

> See http://www.gmayor.com/Numbered_labels.htm
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > numbered 1 thru 150 without having to manually number them myself
> > after the merge?  Thank you for any help you can give me.
Doug Robbins - 16 Aug 2005 17:58 GMT
Did you actually execute the merge to a new document?

Signature

Hope this helps.

Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my
services on a paid consulting basis.

Doug Robbins - Word MVP

>I did the Insert, Field, {SEQ Label}, but still got labels numbered 1-20 on
> each sheet of labels.  What did I do wrong?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> > numbered 1 thru 150 without having to manually number them myself
>> > after the merge?  Thank you for any help you can give me.
Sagit - 17 Aug 2005 02:35 GMT
yes, I did complete the merge.  As a review,  i clicked on Insert, then Field,
under categories, numbering, then SEQ, then Label as identifier, then OK.
After I updated labels, I merged to a new document, went to Print Preview,
and saw that all label sheets started over 1-20. I even tried a switch \n
just for kicks.  
S Jan

> Did you actually execute the merge to a new document?
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> >> > numbered 1 thru 150 without having to manually number them myself
> >> > after the merge?  Thank you for any help you can give me.
Doug Robbins - 17 Aug 2005 05:02 GMT
It would appear then that the numbering is restarting at the section break
between each page of labels.  Try using Edit>Replace with ^b in the Find
what control and ^m in the Replace with control to replace the Section
breaks with manual page breaks.

Signature

Hope this helps.

Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my
services on a paid consulting basis.

Doug Robbins - Word MVP

> yes, I did complete the merge.  As a review,  i clicked on Insert, then
> Field,
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> >> > numbered 1 thru 150 without having to manually number them myself
>> >> > after the merge?  Thank you for any help you can give me.
Sagit - 17 Aug 2005 05:10 GMT
Thanks -  I'm going to try it right now.
Signature

S Jan

> It would appear then that the numbering is restarting at the section break
> between each page of labels.  Try using Edit>Replace with ^b in the Find
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> >> >> > numbered 1 thru 150 without having to manually number them myself
> >> >> > after the merge?  Thank you for any help you can give me.
Sagit - 17 Aug 2005 05:25 GMT
I tried the replace at every stage of the merge and I kept getting the
message that 0 replacements were made.  Thanks for all you are trying to do
for me - I really appreciate your patience!.
Signature

S Jan

> It would appear then that the numbering is restarting at the section break
> between each page of labels.  Try using Edit>Replace with ^b in the Find
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> >> >> > numbered 1 thru 150 without having to manually number them myself
> >> >> > after the merge?  Thank you for any help you can give me.
Graham Mayor - 17 Aug 2005 14:11 GMT
Using LISTNUM fields rather than SEQ fields, which is where you started, the
fields do carry to the merged document. You can manually delete the section
breaks (if Doug doesn't come up with a macro ;) ) by inserting a temporary
paragraph mark before the first page table and displaying the formatting
(CTRL+* )

Signature

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor -  Word MVP

My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>

> I tried the replace at every stage of the merge and I kept getting the
> message that 0 replacements were made.  Thanks for all you are trying
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>>>>>>> number them myself after the merge?  Thank you for any help you
>>>>>>> can give me.
Graham Mayor - 17 Aug 2005 06:08 GMT
Hmmm. This worked when I prepared that web page, but now it doesn't and yes
the numbers restart at the section breaks. Unfortunately swapping the
section breaks for page breaks (or deleting the section breaks) doesn't help
for after the merge the SEQ fields are converted to text. Until I can work
around a solution for this, it looks as though the alternative method will
have to be used :(

Signature

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor -  Word MVP

My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>

> It would appear then that the numbering is restarting at the section
> break between each page of labels.  Try using Edit>Replace with ^b in
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>>>>>> number them myself after the merge?  Thank you for any help you
>>>>>> can give me.
Sagit - 17 Aug 2005 13:47 GMT
I tried Plan B described on your web site using Exel (the first time I tried
it I used Access because it numbers automatically when I paste the table into
it) and the result was the same:  the labels were numbered 1-20 on the first
sheet of labels, 2-21 on the second sheet, 3-22 on the third, etc.   You say
on your website that this plan is ideal for a table where only the number
changes.  Of course, with my address file, everything changes.  Would this
make a difference?  I do appreciate all your efforts in helpiing me.  I am
using Word 2002 under Windows XP, if that is any help.   S Jan

> Hmmm. This worked when I prepared that web page, but now it doesn't and yes
> the numbers restart at the section breaks. Unfortunately swapping the
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> >>>>>> number them myself after the merge?  Thank you for any help you
> >>>>>> can give me.
Graham Mayor - 17 Aug 2005 15:14 GMT
Numbering using the Excel method will not cause this problem, but where
other data is required, it relies on having the number list and the data in
the same file.

Signature

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor -  Word MVP

My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>

> I tried Plan B described on your web site using Exel (the first time
> I tried it I used Access because it numbers automatically when I
[quoted text clipped - 70 lines]
>>>>>>>> number them myself after the merge?  Thank you for any help you
>>>>>>>> can give me.
Sagit - 17 Aug 2005 14:28 GMT
This is interesting:  I inserted Section {SECTION}  on my labels just to see
what is happening with the section numbers and it printed out Section 1 on
all the pages!   I would have expected the section number to change on each
page of labels. I knew Word looks at labels as one long page, but with
numerous sections.
Also, I would have expected the SEQ to be correct if Word thought that there
was only 1 section.  Does this shed any light?
Signature

S Jan

> Hmmm. This worked when I prepared that web page, but now it doesn't and yes
> the numbers restart at the section breaks. Unfortunately swapping the
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> >>>>>> number them myself after the merge?  Thank you for any help you
> >>>>>> can give me.
Graham Mayor - 17 Aug 2005 15:19 GMT
There are definitely section breaks between the tables and different section
numbers are shown in the status bar. There is clearly an anomaly here. How
to correct it is another matter entirely :(

Signature

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor -  Word MVP

My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>

> This is interesting:  I inserted Section {SECTION}  on my labels just
> to see what is happening with the section numbers and it printed out
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
>>>>>>>> number them myself after the merge?  Thank you for any help you
>>>>>>>> can give me.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.