Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Mailmerge and Fax / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

word 2003 mail merge filter problems

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
sian - 22 Aug 2005 19:21 GMT
Recently switched to word 2003/office xp.  When mail merging in word, filters
sometimes work.  At other times although the filter appears to bring up the
correct recipients in the box, when these are merged to a new document all
records are merged not just those filtered.  When I go back to check the
filter it has added additional lines in - although these would not always
result in the document which is created.  Problems seem particularly bad with
negative filters - "not blank", "not equal to".  Have tried using access and
excel as data sources with same effect.  Had no problems before office
upgrade.

Any ideas?
max.rasbold-gabbard - 22 Aug 2005 20:02 GMT
Wish I had an answer, as I've had the exact same problems using an ACT! 2005
datasource in a Word mail merge.  I've found that it's the filters don't work
on True/False fields, though I think I managed to have it sort correctly
once.  I'd appreciate any suggestions/ideas.

> Recently switched to word 2003/office xp.  When mail merging in word, filters
> sometimes work.  At other times although the filter appears to bring up the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Any ideas?
Cindy M  -WordMVP- - 23 Aug 2005 15:15 GMT
Hi =?Utf-8?B?bWF4LnJhc2JvbGQtZ2FiYmFyZA==?=,

> Wish I had an answer, as I've had the exact same problems using an ACT! 2005
> datasource in a Word mail merge.  I've found that it's the filters don't work
> on True/False fields, though I think I managed to have it sort correctly
> once.

Never used Act. But I know Word interprets "true/false" differently than it used
to. If you place such a field in a merge document, then preview the data, what
values does such a field show for true and false in the document? Chances are,
you have to set the filter to exactly that.

used to be, false was equivalent to 0. But they changed that, probably thinking
that "true/false" or "yes/no" is more intuitive <sigh>

Cindy Meister
INTER-Solutions, Switzerland
http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Jun 8 2004)
http://www.word.mvps.org

This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or reply
in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)
max.rasbold-gabbard - 23 Aug 2005 15:32 GMT
Cindy:

Thanks for the response.  I've tried doing True/False and Yes/No in the
recipient filters before, but it seems that, when doing that, Word just
rejects the filter and doesn't filter the recipients at all.  However, based
on your response, I used 0/1 to filter the recipients and that worked
swimmingly.  Many thanks again.

-Max

> Hi =?Utf-8?B?bWF4LnJhc2JvbGQtZ2FiYmFyZA==?=,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or reply
> in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)
Cindy M  -WordMVP- - 23 Aug 2005 15:15 GMT
Hi =?Utf-8?B?c2lhbg==?=,

> Recently switched to word 2003/office xp.  When mail merging in word, filters
> sometimes work.  At other times although the filter appears to bring up the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> excel as data sources with same effect.  Had no problems before office
> upgrade.

so, is it word 2003, or Office XP? these are mutually exclusive. If it's Word
2002, which service packs have you applied?

Which connection method are you using to connect to the data? Are you re-using
existing mail merge documents, already connected to a data source? Or are these
"filters" being set from scratch?

Please give an detailed example.

Cindy Meister
INTER-Solutions, Switzerland
http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Jun 8 2004)
http://www.word.mvps.org

This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or reply
in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)
sian - 24 Aug 2005 17:33 GMT
Cindy
The disks used to install the programme are labelled Microsoft Office Xp
Pro, in the word programme that opens it describes itself as Microsoft word
2003  (11.6359.6360) SP1, part of Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003.

I have created a new word document and used the mail merge toolbar to link
to a database created in access 2000 format (although I have tried with a
brand new dummy version created in access 2003 with the same results and also
an excel spreadsheet).  

Typically my document would look something like this continued down the page:

«Childs_First» «Child_Last» «Roll» «Keyworker» «Next Record»
«Childs_First» «Child_Last» «Roll» «Keyworker» «Next Record» etc

I then click edit recipients on toolbar and go to advanced settings and
choose:
<<Closed>> is blank [This removes children who have already left]
And <<Group>> is equal to <<orange>>
And <<Roll>> is equal to pm [afternoon children only]
Sort by <<Child Last>>

This produces the correct list of children in the edit recipients box, who
can then be selected by ticking.

When I click merge to new document or merge to printer on the toolbar I then
end up with a list of lots of children on the database, but not those
specified.  Going back to edit recipients list to check the filter I find an
additional an additional line between <<Closed>>… and “and <<Group>>…” which
says “or <<closed>> is blank” before carrying on with the rest of the query.

Using different filters it appears that everytime I put in a line which says
“is blank” or “is not equal to” I get additional lines being put in.  
Sometimes it also adds additional sort criteria as well such as “sort by
postcode”.

……and sometimes it works as it should!

Sorry so long but hard to explain – and very desperate for a solution!
Thanks

> Hi =?Utf-8?B?c2lhbg==?=,
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or reply
> in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.