> Recently switched to word 2003/office xp. When mail merging in word, filters
> sometimes work. At other times although the filter appears to bring up the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Any ideas?
Hi =?Utf-8?B?bWF4LnJhc2JvbGQtZ2FiYmFyZA==?=,
> Wish I had an answer, as I've had the exact same problems using an ACT! 2005
> datasource in a Word mail merge. I've found that it's the filters don't work
> on True/False fields, though I think I managed to have it sort correctly
> once.
Never used Act. But I know Word interprets "true/false" differently than it used
to. If you place such a field in a merge document, then preview the data, what
values does such a field show for true and false in the document? Chances are,
you have to set the filter to exactly that.
used to be, false was equivalent to 0. But they changed that, probably thinking
that "true/false" or "yes/no" is more intuitive <sigh>
Cindy Meister
INTER-Solutions, Switzerland
http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Jun 8 2004)
http://www.word.mvps.org
This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or reply
in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)
max.rasbold-gabbard - 23 Aug 2005 15:32 GMT
Cindy:
Thanks for the response. I've tried doing True/False and Yes/No in the
recipient filters before, but it seems that, when doing that, Word just
rejects the filter and doesn't filter the recipients at all. However, based
on your response, I used 0/1 to filter the recipients and that worked
swimmingly. Many thanks again.
-Max
> Hi =?Utf-8?B?bWF4LnJhc2JvbGQtZ2FiYmFyZA==?=,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or reply
> in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-)