
Signature
Hope this helps.
Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my
services on a paid consulting basis.
Doug Robbins - Word MVP
> The entry in my Excel worksheet is a number such as .01 formatted as %.
>
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=c1bd0656-d66d-4
6c0-a23e-1115e1381ffa&dg=microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
Sorry, I had a typo in my response. I went back and edited my merge doc to
include your formula as you have it written below and, after receiving the
invalid formla error message, got the formula in my final document instead of
x%.
The mergefield is valid because I can get it to supply a raw number in my
merge doc. My syntax matches yours - I even tried it with spaces in the
formula.
I wish the MS braintrust would leave software that works alone! I'm sorry I
'upgraded' if you want to call software that doesn't work an upgrade.
Thanks for the help.
> You have an extra # in your field.construction
>
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=c1bd0656-d66d-4
6c0-a23e-1115e1381ffa&dg=microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
Graham Mayor - 21 Dec 2005 06:44 GMT
Did you insert each pair of field boundaries with CTRL+F9 as mentioned on
the web page?
The software works fine - it's the pilot who doesn't have the necessary
training to fly it!

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
> Sorry, I had a typo in my response. I went back and edited my merge
> doc to include your formula as you have it written below and, after
[quoted text clipped - 106 lines]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=c1bd0656-d66d-4
6c0-a23e-1115e1381ffa&dg=microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
ignatious - 23 Dec 2005 22:25 GMT
If I press Ctrl-f9 as suggested, I get {}. Do I have insert my merge field
between them?
The software may work correctly but being able to format a merge field is
common enough that it should be a simple matter if the software was written
well.
> Did you insert each pair of field boundaries with CTRL+F9 as mentioned on
> the web page?
[quoted text clipped - 111 lines]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=c1bd0656-d66d-4
6c0-a23e-1115e1381ffa&dg=microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
Graham Mayor - 24 Dec 2005 07:43 GMT
Between the two brackets {}
Type =
{=}
then either insert your mergefield or better still, press CTRL+F9 again
{={}}
Between the second pair of brackets type Mergefield followed by your
fieldname exactly as it appears in the insert field dialog
{={Mergefield rate_}}
Finally add the calculation and the formatting switch
{ = { MERGEFIELD rate_ } * 100 \# "0%" }
With the cursor in the field Press F9 to update, and if the display does not
switch back on its own, ALT+F9 will switch it.

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
> If I press Ctrl-f9 as suggested, I get {}. Do I have insert my merge
> field between them?
[quoted text clipped - 126 lines]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=c1bd0656-d66d-4
6c0-a23e-1115e1381ffa&dg=microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
ignatious - 29 Dec 2005 22:47 GMT
I tried using alt-f9 to get the brackets in but it still wasn't giving me the
proper result. It turns out, if you use alt-f9 to display codes, it keeps
that setting when you look at the merged doc.
Thanks for the help Graham.
MS did a poor job writing this software. Something like formatting a mail
merge should be more user-friendly. A casual user shouldn't have to probe
about the internet to find how to format raw data. Office 2000 did a good job
of being user-friendly. I am sorry I upgraded to 2003.
> Between the two brackets {}
> Type =
[quoted text clipped - 138 lines]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=c1bd0656-d66d-4
6c0-a23e-1115e1381ffa&dg=microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
Graham Mayor - 30 Dec 2005 07:50 GMT
You insert the field brackets with CTRL+F9
ALT+F9 is a toggle setting between the field construction and the result.
Press it again!

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
> I tried using alt-f9 to get the brackets in but it still wasn't
> giving me the proper result. It turns out, if you use alt-f9 to
[quoted text clipped - 158 lines]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=c1bd0656-d66d-4
6c0-a23e-1115e1381ffa&dg=microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields
Doug Robbins - Word MVP - 21 Dec 2005 06:51 GMT
You must be doing something wrong because it works fine for me with Word
2003. In your latest attempt, did you use Ctrl+F9 to insert all of the
field delimiters {}?

Signature
Hope this helps.
Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my
services on a paid consulting basis.
Doug Robbins - Word MVP
> Sorry, I had a typo in my response. I went back and edited my merge doc to
> include your formula as you have it written below and, after receiving the
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=c1bd0656-d66d-4
6c0-a23e-1115e1381ffa&dg=microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields