Thanks but I need to use SEQ numbers. It is for a page level tag to mark
security classifications.
> The LISTNUM field will work in footnotes and headers/footers. Use {
> LISTNUM LegalDefault \L 1 } to get . . .
> 1.
> 2.
> 3.
> Thanks but I need to use SEQ numbers. It is for a page level tag
> to mark security classifications.
A bit clumsy, but it might work:
Insert the SEQ field in the text, right next to the footnote reference.
Format it as "hidden" and put a bookmark on it.
In the footnote itself, use a cross-reference to that bookmark.
Regards,
Klaus
G.G.Yagoda - 19 Mar 2005 16:23 GMT
Ingenious solution!
Let me add as a postscript that the SEQ field *can* be used in
footnotes, headers/footers and endnotes when it contains the \c switch
to repeat SEQ numbering which appears in the main body. This is
especially helpful when you need page numbering like A-1 for Appendix A
and you've run out of Heading styles, which "Include chapter"
automatically.
In that case, you hide a SEQ field somewhere on the first page of the
Appendix, then in the footer use { SEQ Appx \c }-{ PAGE }.
In the TOC field, add \s Appx at the end and the A-1 will appear in the
TOC. Warning: you need separate TOC fields for each set of compound
page numbers; otherwise the non-compound numbers will come out as 0.
Suzanne S. Barnhill - 19 Mar 2005 18:22 GMT
Fiendishly clever!

Signature
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
> Ingenious solution!
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> TOC. Warning: you need separate TOC fields for each set of compound
> page numbers; otherwise the non-compound numbers will come out as 0.
ML - 19 Mar 2005 23:58 GMT
Thanks but it is too clumsy for the end users. Needs to be as simple as
possible. Hidden markers are just a headache to use and remove.
"ML" wrote:
> Thanks but I need to use SEQ numbers. It is for a page level tag
> to mark security classifications.
A bit clumsy, but it might work:
Insert the SEQ field in the text, right next to the footnote reference.
Format it as "hidden" and put a bookmark on it.
In the footnote itself, use a cross-reference to that bookmark.
Regards,
Klaus