> Sorry for the typo. What I meant was that if you use SectionPages instead of
> NumPages, you can use the same footer in all sections, without need to
> unlink the sections.
>> Sorry for the typo. What I meant was that if you use SectionPages instead of
>> NumPages, you can use the same footer in all sections, without need to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> 1/20, 1/6, 1/5 and 1/9. Is it possible to have the same footer for all
> four pages and somehow put numbering part from the body text?
How do you mean, only involves 4 pages? Footers are per section, not per
page, so doesn't the problem involve 4 sections? If you only want the 1/6 on
a single page, you probably don't want to use a footer at all.
Anyhow, the three sections that you need 1/6, 1/5, and 1/9 for will all have
the same footer, {Page} of {SectionPages}. If the rest of your document uses
{Page} of {Numpages}, you will need to unlink at least the first section
from the rest of the document.
For the 1/20, I think you will need to have a differently defined footer,
that uses {Page} of "calculated page field that adds together the page
numbers from a bookmark on the last page of each of the other three
sections". Only I always forget how to set that up, so someone else will
have to tell you.
Personally, though, I think 1/20 is going to confuse people, because they
will think pages are missing, since the other 19 pages are not numbered as
such.
>somehow put numbering part from the body text?
What do you mean by that? I don't understand.
If it is a reference to one of your original desires:
> to leave the whole footer except "Page X/Y" part the same
No, that is not possible. The entire footer is the same, or it is unlinked.

Signature
Daiya Mitchell, MVP Mac/Word
Word FAQ: http://www.word.mvps.org/
MacWord Tips: <http://www.word.mvps.org/MacWordNew/>
What's an MVP? A volunteer! Read the FAQ: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Marko Pinteric - 17 Aug 2005 08:03 GMT
> Personally, though, I think 1/20 is going to confuse people, because they
> will think pages are missing, since the other 19 pages are not numbered as
> such.
Well, this is the rule specified by the state, not by me.
Unfortunatelly, this means that things cannot be autmated...
Thanks for the effort,
Marko